Abstract

The literature on cohesive devices is marked with evident dearth in studies that consider the context-text ties. The current paper attempts to fill this gap, and, therefore, combat an idealised ‘villain’ in research, which is confining textual analysis to in-text relations. The study propounds the idea of expanding the analysis to include ties between the written text and the surrounding context and culture. The specific purpose is to explore the use and function of the cohesive devices which link the text to the context (exophora) and the ones that relate the text to the culture (homophora). The methodology involved explaining the cohesive devices to a postgraduate TESOL class of eight students (non-native speakers of English) in one of the universities in the UAE. After that, the students were asked to work in pairs and produce four opinion articles about a recent newspaper topic of their choice. They selected the United Kingdom Independent Party (UKIP) leader’s call to ban the burqa in the UK. In addition, two articles from the Independent and the Guardian on the same topic were also discussed. Comparative analysis was conducted on the six articles vis-a-vis the use and functions of cohesive devices. The analysis involved four categories: person deixis , spatial deixis , temporal deixis , and the definite article . The findings showed that exophoric and homopohric cohesive devices were employed abundantly, with exophora occurring in more instances. The study also revealed the relevant functions that have evident implications about assumptive and supportive roles of cohesive devices.

Highlights

  • Halliday and Hasan (1976) designed a comprehensive model of textual analysis that, for the first time investigated the inter-sentential ties in texts, a model that stood at extreme contrast with the -prevailing zeitgeist that opted for limiting the linguistic analysis to the sentence level

  • Cohesive devices have been perceived as the sole instrument for non-structural textual analysis (Halliday & Hasan, 1976), which means that for any linguistic analysis that seeks to go beyond the sentence level, cohesive devices are the sole eISSN: 2550-2131 ISSN: 1675-8021

  • Close examination of the literature revealed that homophoric reference was completely absent, while exophoric reference was scantly represented in the studies that investigated the employment of cohesive devices in a variety of texts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Halliday and Hasan (1976) designed a comprehensive model of textual analysis that, for the first time investigated the inter-sentential ties in texts, a model that stood at extreme contrast with the -prevailing zeitgeist that opted for limiting the linguistic analysis to the sentence level. The 1976 model, which has loomed large in recent years in discourse analysis research (Abu-Ayyash, 2017; Awwad, 2017; Liu & Braine, 2005; Struthers, Lapadat & MacMillan, 2013), addressed the ties that existed between various stretches of texts, and classified the linguistic tools used to serve that purpose into two major categories: grammatical cohesive devices and lexical cohesive devices. The former set includes such textual relations as reference, substitution, ellipsis and conjunctions, while the latter encompasses ties like repetition, collocation, hyponymy, meronymy and synonymy – These devices are explained later within the conceptual framework. Cohesive devices have been perceived as the sole instrument for non-structural textual analysis (Halliday & Hasan, 1976), which means that for any linguistic analysis that seeks to go beyond the sentence level, cohesive devices are the sole eISSN: 2550-2131 ISSN: 1675-8021

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.