Abstract
This paper reexamines optimal commodity and income taxation with consumption indivisibility. We show that, in the presence of indivisible-good consumption, the Atkinson-Stiglitz theorem on the uselessness of commodity taxation fails. Without a distortion on consumption, the optimal commodity tax on indivisible goods acts as a differential lump-sum tax to engage in income redistribution and achieve the social optimum. The optimal tax rate for a specific divisible good is higher (lower) if the divisible good and the indivisible good are substitutes (complements). Differential commodity taxation can always improve welfare under a simple linear income tax system.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.