Abstract

The estimation of carry-over effects is a difficult problem in the design and analysis of clinical trials of treatment sequences including cross-over trials. Except for simple designs, carry-over effects are usually unidentifiable and therefore nonestimable. Solutions such as imposing parameter constraints are often unjustified and produce differing carry-over estimates depending on the constraint imposed. Generalized inverses or treatment-balancing often allow estimating main treatment effects, but the problem of estimating the carry-over contribution of a treatment sequence remains open in these approaches. Moreover, washout periods are not always feasible or ethical. A common feature of designs with unidentifiable parameters is that they do not have design matrices of full rank. Thus, we propose approaches to the construction of design matrices of full rank, without imposing artificial constraints on the carry-over effects. Our approaches are applicable within the framework of generalized linear mixed-effects models. We present a new model for the design and analysis of clinical trials of treatment sequences, called Antichronic System, and introduce some special sequences called Skip Sequences. We show that carry-over effects are identifiable only if appropriate Skip Sequences are used in the design and/or data analysis of the clinical trial. We explain how Skip Sequences can be implemented in practice, and present a method of computing the appropriate Skip Sequences. We show applications to the design of a cross-over study with 3 treatments and 3 periods, and to the data analysis of the STAR*D study of sequences of treatments for depression.

Highlights

  • The estimation of carry-over eects is a challenging problem in the design and analysis of clinical trials (CTs) of treatment sequences

  • Using the robust xed-eects estimates, we found that Stage 1 signicantly aect Y2,ω [overall test with robust estimates, F (7, 1433) = 2.74, p = 0.0079]

  • The other 1-stage treatments included drugs and it is possible that these drugs' blood levels dropped during Stage 2, which may explain in part why Stage 1 treatments did not aect substantially the 2nd stage response

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The estimation of carry-over eects is a challenging problem in the design and analysis of clinical trials (CTs) of treatment sequences. Obtain a Design Matrix of Full Rank This and the section present a convenient notation representing the process of administering a sequence of medical or behavioral treatments (MBTs) to a subject (or a patient) suering from a chronic disease. (In a cross-over trial, a stage corresponds to a period.) At Stage i, li dierent MBTs (or decisions). Ai,j = Ai,j (2018) 191233 for all j = j , but the same decision can be used in two or more dierent stages, that is, we can have that Ai,j = Ai ,j for some i = i and some pair (j, j ). Our methods can accommodate the same treatment occurring at dierent stages for some subjects. In our formulation, the MBTs of a particular stage can have dierent durations. A1,1 can represent administer cognitive therapy for only 1 month, A1,2 can represent administer cognitive therapy for 3 months, and so on

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.