Abstract

The Good Friday Agreement (GFA) attempted to create a workable political framework for managing the conflict in Northern Ireland in a democratic institutional setting. The institutions of the new governing system were based on sectarian self-identification of elites and provided little incentive for politicians to transcend sectarian differences. Since the signing and ratification of this agreement we have witnessed the political success of the more extreme parties at the expense of the moderate parties that were critical to negotiating the GFA. While the parties on the political extremes have moderated, the process of governing has remained extremely difficult because politicians do not perceive any electoral advantage by compromising with the leaders of the other community. The consociational nature of the institutions of the Stormont government has provided a framework where elites representing different communities could bargain and effectively share power in Northern Ireland. However, the lack of a civil society that transcends the sectarian divide with grassroots reconciliation means that elites have little motivation to make the compromises associated with a functioning democratic political framework for Northern Ireland.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.