Consistent results of non-invasive PGT-A of human embryos using two different techniques for chromosomal analysis

Abstract

Research questionAre discordances in non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A) results attributable to the technique used for chromosomal analysis? DesignA prospective blinded study was performed (September 2018 to December 2019). In total 302 chromosomal analyses were performed: 92 trophectoderm PGT-A biopsies and their corresponding spent embryo culture medium (SCM) evaluated by two methods (n = 184), negative controls (n = 8), and trophectoderm and inner cell mass biopsies from trophectoderm-aneuploid embryos (n = 18). Trophectoderm analyses were carried out using Veriseq (Illumina), and SCM was analysed using Veriseq and NICS (Yikon). ResultsGenetic results were obtained for 96.8% of trophectoderm samples versus 92.4% for both SCM techniques. The mosaicism rate was higher for SCM regardless of the technique used: 30.4% for SCM-NICS and 28.3% for SCM-Veriseq versus 14.1% for trophectoderm biopsies (P = 0.013, P = 0.031, respectively). No significant differences in diagnostic concordance were seen between the two SCM techniques (74.6% for SCM-NICS versus 72.3% for SCM-Veriseq; P = 0.861). For embryos biopsied on day 6, these rates reached 92.0% and 86.5%, respectively. On reanalysing trophectoderm-aneuploid embryos, the discrepancies were shown to be due to maternal DNA contamination (55.6%; 5/9), embryo mosaicism (22.2%; 2/9) and low resolution in SCM-NICS (11.1%; 1/9) and in both SCM techniques (11.1%; 1/9). ConclusionsThis is the first study evaluating the consistency of different chromosomal analysis techniques for niPGT-A. In conclusion, the diagnostic concordance between PGT-A and niPGT-A seems independent of the technique used. Optimization of culture conditions and medium retrieval provides a potential target to improve the reliability of niPGT-A.