Abstract
A 1955 result of J. Jakubik states that for the prime intervals p and q of a finite lattice, con(p) ≥ con(q) iff p is congruence-projective to q (via intervals of arbitrary size). The problem is how to determine whether con(p) ≥ con(q) involving only prime intervals. Two recent papers approached this problem in different ways. G. Czedli’s used trajectories for slim rectangular lattices—a special subclass of slim, planar, semimodular lattices. I used the concept of prime-projectivity for arbitrary finite lattices. In this note I show how my approach can be used to reprove Czedli’s result and generalize it to arbitrary slim, planar, semimodular lattices.
Highlights
Jakubık states that for the prime intervals p and q of a finite lattice, con(p) ≥ con(q) iff p is congruence-projective to q
The problem is how to determine whether con(p) ≥ con(q) involving only prime intervals
Two recent papers approached this problem in different ways
Summary
CONGRUENCES AND TRAJECTORIES IN PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES Jakubık states that for the prime intervals p and q of a finite lattice, con(p) ≥ con(q) iff p is congruence-projective to q (via intervals of arbitrary size).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Discussiones Mathematicae - General Algebra and Applications
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.