Conference Ranking based on Academic Network Embedding and Bipartite cross voting

Abstract

Academic networks express the academic relationships among authors, papers and conferences, which offer perspectives and tools to rethink and solve traditional problems in the academic field. Among them, conference ranking is a problem which normally produced by collecting information from different sources and considering many factors. Not like most of the existed ranking methods that based on subjective evaluation, in this paper, we develop a Conference Ranking method based on Academic Network Embedding (CRANE) algorithm to simultaneously rank authors and conferences which improving the accuracy of ranking by embedding the Academic Network. The CRANE uses both conference features like internationality, citations and co-authors, and structure in Academic Network to evaluate the ranking of certain conferences. The theoretical analysis and convergence analysis were provided in this paper. Experiments on datasets of the Digital Bibliography & Library Project (DBLP) and AMiner academic platforms also be conducted. The experimental results show that the CRANE algorithm is superior to other algorithms by comparing with the public academic ranking like the China Computer Federation (CCF) ranking.