Abstract
Background Maxillary anterior teeth play an important role in aesthetics, phonetics, and mastication. Because of the aesthetic and functional significance, it is important to evaluate their position in association with surrounding structures in 3-D before initiating orthodontic treatment. With the advent of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in orthodontic diagnosis, it is now possible to identify these structures. One such structure is the incisive canal. Uncertainty in locating the canal can cause root resorption postorthodontic retraction of anterior maxillary teeth. Objective(s) The aim of this study was to calculate the relative distance between the incisive canal and maxillary central incisor using CBCT and utilize the results for orthodontic treatment planning. Study Design All quantitative measurements between the incisive canal and both maxillary central incisors were performed using CBCT on 61 patients. The anteroposterior measurements were taken on both sides, and the average of both values was considered for the statistical analysis. The Steiner cephalometric analysis was performed to select patients with skeletal and dental Class I relationship. All linear measurements were performed on the axial plane at 3 different vertical reference points located on the sagittal plane: (1) the palatal opening of the incisive canal (opening level, P1), (2) midlevel between the opening level and the root apex of the maxillary central incisors (midlevel, P2), and (3) the root apex of the maxillary central incisors (root apex level, P3). Results The average anteroposterior distance between the maxillary central incisor roots and the incisive canal was approximately 56 mm. Discussion/Conclusions The results of our study could be clinically helpful to plan orthodontic treatment that requires significant retraction of maxillary incisors. The authors support the idea of a pretreatment CBCT in cases that require maximum anterior retraction in the maxilla. Maxillary anterior teeth play an important role in aesthetics, phonetics, and mastication. Because of the aesthetic and functional significance, it is important to evaluate their position in association with surrounding structures in 3-D before initiating orthodontic treatment. With the advent of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in orthodontic diagnosis, it is now possible to identify these structures. One such structure is the incisive canal. Uncertainty in locating the canal can cause root resorption postorthodontic retraction of anterior maxillary teeth. The aim of this study was to calculate the relative distance between the incisive canal and maxillary central incisor using CBCT and utilize the results for orthodontic treatment planning. All quantitative measurements between the incisive canal and both maxillary central incisors were performed using CBCT on 61 patients. The anteroposterior measurements were taken on both sides, and the average of both values was considered for the statistical analysis. The Steiner cephalometric analysis was performed to select patients with skeletal and dental Class I relationship. All linear measurements were performed on the axial plane at 3 different vertical reference points located on the sagittal plane: (1) the palatal opening of the incisive canal (opening level, P1), (2) midlevel between the opening level and the root apex of the maxillary central incisors (midlevel, P2), and (3) the root apex of the maxillary central incisors (root apex level, P3). The average anteroposterior distance between the maxillary central incisor roots and the incisive canal was approximately 56 mm. The results of our study could be clinically helpful to plan orthodontic treatment that requires significant retraction of maxillary incisors. The authors support the idea of a pretreatment CBCT in cases that require maximum anterior retraction in the maxilla.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Incisive Canal
Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Maxillary Central Incisors
Maxillary Central Incisor Roots
Maxillary Incisors
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Jan 1, 2020
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Apr 1, 2011
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Nov 1, 2021
The Angle Orthodontist
Nov 27, 2015
The Angle Orthodontist
Nov 28, 2022
Applied Sciences
Nov 3, 2023
International Journal of Advanced Research
Apr 30, 2023
The Korean Journal of Orthodontics
May 25, 2020
Folia Morphologica
May 30, 2022
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
May 1, 2011
American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
Mar 1, 2022
Journal of Orofacial Sciences
Jan 1, 2018
Austin Journal of Dentistry
Jul 16, 2021
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Mar 1, 2022
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Nov 1, 2023