Abstract
ess were presented to rats licking sucrose after one of several off-the-baseline Pavlovian defense conditioning procedures. Two random procedures in which there was no cs-us contingency were constructed by programming ess and uss on independent random schedules which had either a long or a short variable inter-cs interval (vrn). Because the cs took up more of the session in the short vrn procedure, it contained more cs-us pairings and produced cs-elicited suppression of ticking. Suppression occurred with neither the long vrn group nor with shock alone controls. Conditioning was all-or-none after both classical and random procedures. ACCORDING TO THE CONTINGENCY THEORY of classical conditioning, excit
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
