Abstract

BackgroundIndia is revising its mental health legislation with the Indian Mental Healthcare Act 2017 (IMHA). When implemented, this legislation will apply to over 1.25 billion people. In 2005, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a Resource Book (WHO-RB) on mental health, human rights and legislation, including a checklist of 175 specific items to be addressed in mental health legislation or policy in individual countries. Even following the publication of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) (2006), the WHO-RB remains the most comprehensive checklist for mental health legislation available, rooted in UN and WHO documents and providing the most systematic, detailed framework for human rights analysis of mental health legislation. We sought to determine the extent to which the IMHA will bring Indian legislation in line with the WHO-RB.MethodsThe IMHA and other relevant pieces of Indian legislation are compared to each of the items in the WHO-RB. We classify each item in a binary manner, as either concordant or not, and provide more nuanced detail in the text.ResultsThe IMHA addresses 96/175 (55.4%) of the WHO-RB standards examined. When other relevant Indian legislation is taken into account, 118/175 (68.0%) of the standards are addressed in Indian law. Important areas of low concordance include the rights of families and carers, competence and guardianship, non-protesting patients and involuntary community treatment. The important legal constructs of advance directives, supported decision-making and nominated representatives are articulated in the Indian legislation and explored in this paper.ConclusionsIn theory, the IMHA is a highly progressive piece of legislation, especially when compared to legislation in other jurisdictions subject to similar analysis. Along with the Indian Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016, it will bring Indian law closely in line with the WHO-RB. Vague, opaque language is however, used in certain contentious areas; this may represent arrangement-focused rather than realisation-focused legislation, and lead to inadvertent limitation of certain rights. Finally, the WHO-RB checklist is an extremely useful tool for this kind of analysis; we recommend it is updated to reflect the CRPD and other relevant developments.

Highlights

  • India is revising its mental health legislation with the Indian Mental Healthcare Act 2017 (IMHA)

  • It is questionable whether the general nature of the Rights of Persons with Disability Act 2016 (RPDA) enables it to address the particular challenges presented by mental illness [18]. This concern is underlined by the fact that the IMHA does not directly address many of the areas of discrimination or social rights highlighted in the United Nations (UN)-CRPD or the World Health Organization (WHO) Resource Book on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation (WHORB). These matters are of considerable relevance to the analysis presented in this paper, which considers the new Indian legislation in the context of the standards set out in the WHO-RB, and they are discussed in the relevant sections of the paper

  • The RPDA is the main piece of legislation outside of the IMHA which addresses specific items of the WHO-RB

Read more

Summary

Introduction

India is revising its mental health legislation with the Indian Mental Healthcare Act 2017 (IMHA). When implemented, this legislation will apply to over 1.25 billion people. Mental health is a major concern in India; major depressive disorder is the leading cause of years lived with disability and anxiety is the ninth leading cause [2]. The number of individuals affected by mental illness is enormous; it is estimated that 2.5 million people have schizophrenia, 8.8 million have bipolar affective disorder (BPAD), 36.8 million have anxiety disorders and 13.4 million have alcohol dependence [4]. Males in the 30–49 age group have the highest prevalence of mental morbidity; in addition to the impact on these individuals and their families, this has major implications for India’s productivity [3]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.