Abstract

Concolic execution has achieved great success in many binary analysis tasks. However, it is still not a primary option for industrial usage. A well-known reason is that concolic execution cannot scale up to large-size programs. Many research efforts have focused on improving its scalability. Nonetheless, we find that, even when processing small-size programs, concolic execution suffers a great deal from the accuracy and scalability issues. This paper systematically investigates the challenges that can be introduced even by small-size programs, such as symbolic array and symbolic jump. We further verify that the proposed challenges are non-trivial via real-world experiments with three most popular concolic execution tools: BAP, Triton, and Angr. Among a set of 22 logic bombs we designed, Angr can solve only four cases correctly, while BAP and Triton perform much worse. The results imply that current tools are still primitive for practical industrial usage. We summarize the reasons and release the bombs as open source to facilitate further study.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.