Conclusion

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

AbstractThis book has aimed to present, discuss, and critically analyze Leopold Blaustein’s philosophy in different frameworks which determined its thematic scope, main concepts, arguments, and developments. This goal stemmed from the lack of exhaustive studies on the legacy of Blaustein. Some scholars have examined selected topics in his writings, wherein his view on Edmund Husserl’s theory of intentionality is probably the most discussed, but there has not yet been a systematic examination of his various contributions to philosophy. This is not to say, of course, that his thought was unimportant. Just the opposite. In the scholarly literature, one can easily find authors who testify that Blaustein was an important and novel thinker whose ideas were ahead of his time. This opinion is fully justified. I have presented his intellectual biography in the previous chapters, and against this background, I have discussed his theoretical struggles with the question of the methods used in descriptive psychology and phenomenology, as well as his philosophy of mind, his aesthetics, and his pioneering analyses of the experience of media. Considering the results of our analysis, one can agree that Blaustein’s explorations were indeed eclectic, but his readings of, among others, Husserl, Kazimierz Twardowski, Moriz Geiger, and Alexius Meinong were marked by careful questioning of the analyzed theories and, as a result, critical assessments. Undoubtedly, Blaustein referred to other theories not so much to repeat their main points but to attempt to achieve original outcomes; for instance, he critically reformulated and enlarged Twardowski’s taxonomy of presentations to describe phenomena such as cinemagoers’ experiences or embodied perception.