Abstract
The conclusion summarizes the principal arguments of the book and discusses the potentials and limitations of using the human rights systemic analytical model (HRSAM). It advances recommendations for addressing the problem of lack of freedom in La Oroya with regard to both short-term and long-term measures. Drawing on the reality of conflicted local responses to mining investments, as well as the micro, meso, and macro paradoxes an economic dependency on this industry entails, this chapter urges opening debate and deepening reflection on the challenge of finding consensus about the good living in the context of hybrid societies whose economies are strongly tied to the extractive sector.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
