Abstract

In a world that is uncertain and noisy, perception makes use of optimization procedures that rely on the statistical properties of previous experiences. A well-known example of this phenomenon is the central tendency effect observed in many psychophysical modalities. For example, in interval timing tasks, previous experiences influence the current percept, pulling behavioural responses towards the mean. In Bayesian observer models, these previous experiences are typically modelled by unimodal statistical distributions, referred to as the prior. Here, we critically assess the validity of the assumptions underlying these models and propose a model that allows for more flexible, yet conceptually more plausible, modelling of empirical distributions. By representing previous experiences as a mixture of lognormal distributions, this model can be parametrized to mimic different unimodal distributions and thus extends previous instantiations of Bayesian observer models. We fit the mixture lognormal model to published interval timing data of healthy young adults and a clinical population of aged mild cognitive impairment patients and age-matched controls, and demonstrate that this model better explains behavioural data and provides new insights into the mechanisms that underlie the behaviour of a memory-affected clinical population.

Highlights

  • In a world that is uncertain and noisy, perception makes use of optimization procedures to reduce the influence of moment-tomoment noise by incorporating statistical properties of previous royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R

  • We demonstrated that participants diagnosed with MCI demonstrated a stronger central tendency effect than age-matched, healthy control (HC) participants

  • Especially in the case of the Uniform model as implemented here, central tendency effects are defined as a function of clock noise, as only by increasing the width of the likelihood can this model explain stronger central tendency effects. This rules out the possibility that memory-based explanations drive observed central tendency effects, which we argue is an important explanatory variable when considering the behavioural patterns observed in clinical populations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a world that is uncertain and noisy, perception makes use of optimization procedures to reduce the influence of moment-tomoment noise by incorporating statistical properties of previous royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R. This observation holds for the perception of many psychophysical quantities [1], including 2 the estimation of distance [2] and angles [3], object size [4] and duration [5,6] These types of optimization procedures assume that when a specific stimulus needs to be reproduced, observers do take the current percept into account and incorporate their prior knowledge of previous similar incidents to form an internal estimate of this stimulus. This process yields more optimal average responses when the perception of quantities is noisy, with the central tendency effect [4,7] as its prime signature. Even though the central tendency effect was one of the first timing phenomena described in the literature, a formal account of this phenomenon has only recently been proposed

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.