Conceptual Engineering: A Footnote to Plato

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon
Take notes icon Take Notes

Abstract If concepts are to what the predicates in our language refer, then Plato would say that concepts are nonspatiotemporal entities, called “Forms,” and as such cannot be created, changed, or destroyed. Thus, if conceptual engineering requires that concepts can be created or changed, then Plato could not accurately be called a conceptual engineer. On the other hand, Plato did think that we can create or change the sights and sounds we use as tools by means of our shared thinking which refer to those unchanging concepts. Those sights and sounds are the symbols, that is, the written and spoken language, that we use in order to communicate with one another about the things that exist. Plato, then, thought of a shared language as an educated guess about the way the world in fact is. We agree to use those symbols because we have good reasons to believe that the closer our shared language is to the way the world in fact is, the more beneficial using that language will be for us in accomplishing our ultimate goal of having the best life we can possibly have. Therefore, if concepts are not to what the predicates in our language refer, but instead, are the educated guesses as to what those eternally unchanging Forms are, then Plato would be a conceptual engineer par excellence as he did think that we can and do create and revise our educated guesses as we learn more about the way the world in fact is.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • 10.1115/gt2023-103638
An Educated Guess - Predicting Turbomachinery Efficiencies of Aero Engines During Conceptual Design
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • Jannik Häßy + 2 more

Evolutionary advancements and disruptive concepts for future gas turbine-based propulsion systems are researched to reduce the environmental impact of aviation. In the initial design phase, only few data on component efficiencies is available and assumptions have to be introduced. However, comparability and consistency between assumed efficiencies is crucial to benchmark different designs or concepts in a feasible way and to avoid misleading findings. The assumptions made have to reflect the impact of design parameters on efficiency considering underlying physical phenomena. A simple model is developed to predict the design efficiencies of axial flow turbo components of aero engines with the aim to generate traceable, consistent and comparable assumptions for conceptual engine design. The efficiency prediction model combines existing approaches from published sources using a superposition principle and is calibrated by means of available data on engines with an entry into service later than 2010. For a stage-wise evaluation approach, the calibrated model predicts the component efficiencies of database engines with a maximum absolute deviation of 0.1 % for fans, 2.2 % for compressors, 1.4 % for cooled turbines and 0.6 % for low-pressure turbines. The deviations between predictions and database values create a sense for the uncertainty that has to be expected using the calibrated model. The future application of the predictive capability contributes to feasible comparisons between different engine configurations during the conceptual design phase.

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close
  • Ask R Discovery Star icon
  • Chat PDF Star icon

AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.