Abstract

College students classified the sex of day-old chicks from drawings of their genital eminences. Employing geometrie forms as one category of training stimuli increased errors on test stimuli. This between-category similarity outcome contrasts with others to some extent, and it also argues against the sufficiency of a template model of conceptual functioning. Training with only a single pair of exemplars also impaired transfer. Other research has confounded exemplar number with amount of training Informing subjects of the number of categories the drawings belong to failed to facilitate transfer significantly. A description of the prototypical features differentiating the two sex categories enhanced transfer. Several aspects of the communication may have been influential.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.