Computed tomography-based anatomic suitability of an Endo-Bentall prosthesis for ascending aortic aneurysms

Abstract

IntroductionThis study aimed to evaluate the suitability of a coronary-branched ascending aortic endograft, paired with aortic valve (AV) prosthesis (Endo-Bentall), for the endovascular repair of ascending aortic aneurysms. MethodsPre-operative ≤1mm computed tomography angiographies of consecutive patients managed with Bentall procedure or ascending aortic replacement and AV reconstruction/replacement, in a single institution (01.01.2008-31.12.2023), were retrospectively analyzed. Dedicate software was used to assess: (1) vascular access, (2) proximal landing zone, (3) coronary artery anatomy and (4) distal landing. Eligibility criteria for Endo-Bentall were: ≥8mm iliac arteries, without severe calcification/tortuosity, proximal landing with 18-29mm aortic annulus diameter, ≥10mm annulus-coronary ostium distance, no mechanical AV, absence of coronary grafts in the ascending aorta, no left ventricle thrombus, coronary arteries ≥3mm wide and ≥10mm long, with no anatomic abnormalities, ostial stent or stenosis and ≥20mm long and ≤38mm wide distal landing zone within the ascending aorta or applicability of branched endovascular arch repair. ResultsTwenty-nine patients (55.2% females) were included. All patients had adequate proximal landing zone in terms of annulus diameter (median: 25mm, IQR: 5mm). Two (6.8%) had inadequate iliac access (external iliac artery <8mm). Two patients (6.8%) had a mechanical AV. Twenty-six patients (89.6%) had adequate landing zone for stenting of the left main coronary artery (LMCA; median diameter: 5.2mm, IQR: 1.8mm) and 28 (96.6%) had adequate right coronary artery (RCA) landing (median diameter: 4.1, IQR: 1mm). The LMCA and RCA were located at 5:00' and 10:50’ clock positions, respectively. Three patients (20.7%) had an adequate distal landing zone within the ascending aorta. The remaining were suitable for extension with a branched arch device. According to the predefined criteria, 75.9% of patients were anatomically suitable for Endo-Bentall. ConclusionThree out of four patients with ascending aortic aneurysms may be considered as anatomically eligible for endovascular treatment with an Endo-Bentall prosthesis.