Abstract

With the simulation of engineering processes via numerical methods on the rise comes the need for a quantitative measure of the agreement between computational results and experimental measurements. The use of quantitative methods in the comparison of the results of numerical and experimental analyses supersedes the traditional qualitative approach. In the present paper, the importance of the role of modeling assumptions in a verification and validation effort is illustrated through a mesoscale combustor example. The various types of uncertainties encountered in the experimentation and numerical simulation are investigated. Through the investigation the initial modeling assumptions proved to be insufficient, producing a comparison error outside of the acceptable range. Thus, the modeling assumptions were sequentially revised, minimizing the comparison error and producing a successful verification and validation effort.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.