Compulsory community treatment and ethnicity: Findings from a culturally and linguistically diverse area of Queensland

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the use of community treatment orders (CTOs) and forensic orders (FOs) in a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) population to that in a non-CALD population. MethodsWe analysed the relationship between coming from a CALD background and the use of CTOs and FOs on discharge from hospital using merged data from the Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service's Transitions of Care (ToC) and Consumer Integrated Mental Health Application (CIMHA) databases. ResultsNine hundred and seventy-six individual records were included in the data set, of whom eighty-six were from a CALD background (8.8%). Three hundred and eleven patients were on compulsory community treatment. Use of compulsory community treatment (CTOs and FOs) was similar for those born in Australasia, British Isles, North America and Europe but significantly higher for those born elsewhere even after adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical variables (Adj OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.36–3.52). The use of an interpreter significantly increased the likelihood of compulsory community treatment (Adj OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.20–6.35). Restricting the analyses to CTOs only did not alter these results. ConclusionsMetro South residents from a CALD background outside of Europe were over-represented on compulsory community treatment orders. This could reflect the difficulties in accessing voluntary services, communication barriers, stigma associated with mental illness, discrimination, or issues related to accurately diagnosing mental illness cross-culturally. Clinicians need to be aware of the complexity of working with people from diverse cultures and apply these orders judiciously.