Compromise of Radiology Studies From Nonstandardized Viewing Platforms.

Abstract

There is no standardization of proprietary radiology viewing software platform functions allowing recorded digital radiographic imaging studies on compact discs (CDs) to be viewed in a standardized manner at subsequent institutions. Primary concerns include the following: (1) a large number of image viewing software platforms with a wide variety of features making familiarity with use difficult, (2) an inordinate amount of time required to load imaging data, (3) imaging data may not upload or be viewed with the care center's picture archiving and communication system, (4) navigation through imaging studies is inconsistent and tedious, and (5) image viewing requires additional software downloads. Additionally, images generated from "outside CDs" are frequently of low quality and resolution, eliminating the ability to render a reliable diagnosis. The authors sought to determine the frequency and extent of these functional problems by analyzing a sample of 50 consecutive radiology CDs containing imaging studies referred to a university orthopedic oncology practice. Eighteen different viewing software platforms were encountered. Only 24 (48%) of the CDs met all optimal system criteria. Mean time required to load the studies was 3.4 seconds using the picture archiving and communication system and 37.9 seconds using the proprietary viewing software (P<.001). Fifteen (30%) of the CDs did not upload to the institution's picture archiving and communication system, and 18 (36%) required additional downloads and/or license agreements. Four CDs did not contain Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine images. Physicians using radiology studies on CDs encounter numerous difficulties in evaluating patients' imaging data because of the plethora of viewing software platforms. These difficulties add time and cost and compromise patient care. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(1):e136-e141.].