Comprehensive post-marketing safety evaluation of atezolizumab: A disproportionality analysis based on individual case safety reports in the FAERS.

Comparing Common Therapies in Polycythemia Vera (PV): A Disproportionality Analysis in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database

Objective: To investigate and analyze the post-marketing adverse event (AE) data of multiple sclerosis (MS) therapeutic drug dalfampridine using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for its clinical safety application. Methods: Use OpenVigil2.1 platform to obtain AE data of dalfampridine from FAERS from February 2010 to September 2022. Match "adverse drug reaction" with preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), then merge the same PT and delete non-AE PT. Positive signals were identified by the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) methods. When AE signals met the criteria of those three methods, they were identified as positive signals. Results: A total of 44,092 dalfampridine-related AE reports were obtained, and 335 AE signals were identified, including 11,889 AE reports. AEs were more common in females and in the 45-65 age group, which is consistent with the epidemiological characteristics of MS. The 335 AE signals involved 21 SOCs, including investigations, infections and infestations, eye disorders, etc. Among the top 20 PTs in signal strength, 10 were associated with abnormal lymphocyte percentage and count, and 5 were associated with abnormal urine tests, some of which were not described in the instruction, such as spinal cord injury cauda equina, haemoglobin urine present, urinary sediment abnormal and so on. The most frequently reported AE signals were urinary tract infection, dizziness, condition aggravated. In addition, 23 AE signals with death outcomes were identified, with an incidence of less than 0.1%. Conclusion: Data mining of FAERS was conducted to analyze the AEs of dalfampridine, and new AE signals were found. This study provides a reference for the safe use of dalfampridine in the treatment of MS.

This study aimed to detect adverse event (AE) signals associated with degarelix by analyzing data from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), so as to provide evidence for its safe clinical use. Data from the FAERS database spanning January 2014 to December 2024 were extracted, cleaned, and deduplicated. A disproportionality analysis was performed to identify significant AE signals by calculating and comparing four established metrics: the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), the Information Component of the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and the Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM). Statistical significance for signal detection was defined as exceeding the predefined thresholds for each respective metric. AEs were coded with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Among 17,048,812 AE reports recorded in FAERS during the study period, 2,984 were associated with degarelix. These reports spanned 22 System Organ Classes (SOC), and 130 Preferred Terms (PTs) showed significant disproportionate reporting based on the four algorithms. Injection site reactions and hot flush were consistent with common AEs listed in the label. It is noteworthy that 53 AEs, such as interstitial lung disease, cardiac failure, osteoporotic fracture, and hyperkalaemia, were absent from the label and may represent previously unreported risks that warrant further study. Our findings not only validate the established safety data for degarelix but also reveal potential new risks, necessitating continued post-marketing vigilance to guide its safer clinical application.

Objective: In recent years, the emergence of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) has significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM); however, serious adverse events (AEs) have hindered their safe clinical application. This study aimed to characterize the safety profiles and differences in IMiDs through a disproportionality analysis using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), a post-marketing surveillance database.Methods: This study filtered reports of thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide as primary suspect drugs in FAERS files from January 2013 to December 2021. AEs in the reports were retrieved according to the preferred terms (PTs) of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Furthermore, we detected safety signals using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian belief propagation neural network (BCPNN). When all three algorithms showed an association between the target drug and the AE, a positive signal was generated.Results: We extracted 9,968 thalidomide, 231,926 lenalidomide, and 55,066 pomalidomide AE reports. AEs were more common in male patients and in those >44 years old. Important safety signals were detected based on the system organ classes (SOC), including thalidomide (cardiac disorders: ROR, 2.87; PRR, 2.79; IC 1.22), lenalidomide (gastrointestinal disorders: ROR, 2.38; PRR, 2.27; IC 0.75), and pomalidomide (respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders: ROR, 2.14; PRR, 2.09; IC 0.85). Within the PT level, we identified novel risk signals: the thalidomide-induced second primary malignancy (SPM) signal was significant; lenalidomide reduced the success rate of hematopoietic stem cell collection; and three IMiDs may cause human chorionic gonadotropin increase, but this needs to be proven by clinical data. Pneumonia, sepsis, and renal failure are common risk factors for death due to IMiDs. Compared with thalidomide and lenalidomide, pomalidomide has a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is beneficial to patients with renal insufficiency.Conclusion: Mining data from FAERS resulted in novel AE signals, including adenocarcinoma of colon, harvest failure of blood stem cells, and increased levels of human chorionic gonadotropin. Further investigation is required to verify the significance of these signals. Moreover, IMiDs showed differences in safety reports, which should be emphasized by clinicians.

Sacubitril/valsartan is extensively used in heart failure; however, there are few long-term safety studies of it in a wide range of populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate sacubitril/valsartan-induced adverse events (AEs) through data mining of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reports in the FAERS from the third quarter of 2015 (FDA approval of sacubitril/valsartan) to the fourth quarter of 2023 were collected and analyzed. Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) algorithms were adopted in data mining to quantify signals of sacubitril/valsartan-associated AEs. A total of 12,001,275 reports of sacubitril/valsartan as the "primary suspected (PS)" and 99,651 AEs induced by sacubitril/valsartan were identified. More males than females reported AEs (59.95% vs. 33.31%), with the highest number of reports in the 60-70years age group (8.11%), and most AEs occurred < 7days (14.13%) and ≥ 60days (10.69%) after dosing. Sacubitril/valsartan-induced AE occurrence targeted 24 system organ classes (SOCs) and 294 preferred terms (PTs). Of these, 4 SOCs were strongly positive for all four algorithms, including cardiac disorders, vascular disorders, ear and labyrinth disorders, and respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders. Among all PTs, consistent with the specification, hypotension (n = 10,078) had the highest number of reports, and dizziness, cough, peripheral swelling, blood potassium increased, and renal impairment were also reported in high numbers. Notably, this study also discovered a high frequency of side effects such as death, dyspnea, weight change, feeling abnormal, hearing loss, memory impairment, throat clearing, and diabetes mellitus. This study identified potential new AE signals and gained a more general understanding of the safety of sacubitril/valsartan, promoting its rational adoption in the cardiovascular system.

BackgroundInvasive aspergillosis (IA) poses significant mortality risks, particularly in immunocompromised patients. The safety profiles of FDA-approved antifungal agents, triazoles (Voriconazole, Posaconazole, Isavuconazole), polyenes (Amphotericin B), and echinocandins (Caspofungin), are not yet fully characterized in real-world settings. This study employed pharmacovigilance data to systematically evaluate the comparative safety profiles of these agents, providing evidence-based insights for clinical practice.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data (2004Q1–2024Q3) was conducted. Disproportionality analyses, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma-Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), were employed to identify adverse event (AE) signals. Duplicate entries were identified and removed using CASE_ID and FDA_DT criteria, after which AE signals were classified according to MedDRA System Organ Classes (SOCs) and Preferred Terms (PTs).ResultsAmong 26,004 antifungal-associated AE reports, Amphotericin B exhibited the strongest renal toxicity signals (nephropathy toxic (i.e., nephrotoxicity): ROR = 24.86; renal tubular disorder: ROR = 46.46), while voriconazole was associated with hepatobiliary disorders (ROR = 4.61) and ocular toxicity (toxic optic neuropathy: ROR = 228.80). Caspofungin demonstrated marked hepatotoxicity (cholestasis: ROR = 23.79), whereas Posaconazole and Isavuconazole showed lower mortality rates (19.56% and 22.70%, respectively). Amphotericin B demonstrated the highest mortality rate (47.14%), which was statistically significantly higher compared to other agents (χ2 test, p < 0.001), and life-threatening AE rates (4.97%), contrasting with Isavuconazole’s favorable safety profile (1.89% life-threatening AEs). Time-to-onset analysis revealed delayed AE onset for Isavuconazole (median: 19.5 days) versus Caspofungin (6 days).ConclusionSignificant safety variations exist among antifungal agents for IA. Amphotericin B and Caspofungin are associated with severe renal/hepatic toxicities and higher mortality, while Isavuconazole and Posaconazole may offer safer alternatives with delayed AE onset. Clinicians should prioritize drug-specific risks when tailoring treatment for IA patients.

Irinotecan is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent for treating colorectal, pancreatic, and ovarian cancers. Despite its therapeutic efficacy, the safety profile of irinotecan necessitates continuous pharmacovigilance due to its association with severe adverse drug events (ADEs). Given its global use, cross-national signal detection may reveal region-specific risks or unrecognized adverse effects. We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of irinotecan-associated ADEs using two large spontaneous reporting systems: the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japan Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. ADE reports between 2004 and 2024 were extracted. Disproportionality analyses were performed using four methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and Multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS). A total of 11,344 ADE reports from FAERS and 7,822 from JADER were identified. These reports involved 27 system organ classes (SOCs). In FAERS, the most frequently affected SOC was gastrointestinal disorders (n = 6,888), while in JADER it was blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 3,389). Disproportionality analysis revealed 388 and 67 preferred terms (PTs) significantly associated with irinotecan in FAERS and JADER, respectively, with 38 overlapping signals. These included both expected ADEs (e.g., neutropenia, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis) and unexpected signals such as second primary malignancies, hyperammonaemia, and hiccups. Notable FAERS-specific signals included skin toxicity (n=100, ROR 33.89 (27.79-41.34), PRR 33.80, EBGM05 28.03, IC025 4.76), aphasia [n=65, ROR 3.57 (2.8-4.55), PRR 3.56, EBGM05 2.90, IC025 1.47], and hepatic failure [n=56, ROR 3.09 (2.38-4.02), PRR 3.09, EBGM05 2.48, IC025 1.24], while JADER-specific signals included fatigue [n=73, ROR 4.69 (3.71-5.93), PRR 4.67, EBGM05 3.57, IC025 0.51], hyperammonaemia [n=67, ROR 7.24 (5.56-9.27), PRR 7.21, EBGM05 5.32, IC025 1.10], and cholinergic syndrome [n=27, ROR 5.54 (3.76-8.16), PRR 5.53, EBGM05 3.61, IC025 0.74]. Over half of all reported ADEs occurred within one month of irinotecan administration (53.1% in FAERS, 61.7% in JADER). The median time to onset was 28 days [IQR 9-76] in FAERS and 17 days [IQR 9-57] in JADER. This comparative analysis revealed multiple consistent and unexpected signals related to irinotecan use. The findings emphasize the importance of region-specific pharmacovigilance and the need for heightened awareness of both labeled and unlabeled toxicities. Our results support continued monitoring and further investigation into temporal patterns and regional differences in irinotecan-related adverse events to enhance clinical safety.

A Real-World Disproportionality Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System(FAERS) Event for Belatacept.

Quinolones are widely prescribed for the treatment or prevention of infectious diseases in children. To gain further insight into quinolone-associated adverse event (AE) in children and better protect pediatric patients, continued surveillance of safety data is essential. The purpose of this study was to characterize the safety profiles of quinolone-associated AEs in children by mining the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS). FAERS reports from quarter 1 of 2004 to quarter 1 of 2022 were included in the study. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) was used to identify adverse events. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and information component (IC) along with 95% CIs were calculated to detect drug-AE pairs with higher-than-expected reporting rates within the FAERS from System Organ Classes (SOCs) to Preferred Terms (PTs). Reports were considered as signals if the 95% confidence interval did not contain the null value. After inclusion criteria were applied, a total of 4,704 reports associated with quinolones were considered. Most FAERS reports associated with ciprofloxacin (N = 2,706) followed by levofloxacin (N = 1,191), moxifloxacin (N = 375), oflaxacin (N = 245) and ozenoxacin (N = 187). The most common age group was 12-18 years. The median weight was 39.0 kilogram. The adverse effects of quinolones emerging for SOCs primarily included Infections and infestations, gastrointestinal symptoms, blood and lymphatic system disorders, cardiac disorders, nervous system disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders and psychiatric disorders. The most frequently AE signals at the PT level were pyrexia (N = 236), febrile neutropenia (N = 120), off label use (N = 48), drug resistance (N = 18) and cardiac arrest (N = 22) following the use of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, and ozenoxacin, respectively. Serious oznoxacin-associated AE signals were found and have not been documented in the package insert. They included cardiac arrest (N = 22; ROR = 19.83; IC = 3.68), overdose (N = 21; ROR = 4.98; IC = 2.07), seizure (N = 16; ROR = 6.01; IC = 2.29), small for dates baby (N = 9; ROR = 14.7; IC = 3.05), completed suicide (N = 15, ROR = 18.87; IC = 3.51), asthma (N = 9; ROR = 6.69; IC = 2.24;) and hypotension (N = 9; ROR = 3.83; IC = 1.68). This study provided additional evidence with respect to quinolones-related AEs for children. Generally, the findings of this study are compatible with AEs recorded in package inserts. The unexpected signals of ozenoxacin justify active vigilance by clinicians and timely monitoring by pharmacovigilance experts.

BackgroundDeutetrabenazine is a widely used drug for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia (TD), and post-marketing testing is important. There is a lack of real-world, large-sample safety studies of deutetrabenazine. In this study, a pharmacovigilance analysis of deutetrabenazine was performed based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to evaluate its relevant safety signals for clinical reference.MethodsAdverse events (AEs) of FAERS with deutetrabenazine as the primary suspect drug were collected from the first quarter (Q1) of 2017 to Q1 of 2024. Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM) were used to mine AEs risk signals of deutetrabenazine. AEs were standardized and classified using the System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Terms (PTs) from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 23.0.ResultsA total of 3,583 AEs with deutetrabenazine as the primary suspect drug were collected in this study. We found that these AEs involved 23 SOCs, and the positive signals were mainly concentrated in systemic disease and various reactions at the site of administration (n = 1816, ROR = 1.23, PRR = 1.18, IC = 0.24, EBGM = 1.18), neurological disorders (n = 1736, ROR = 3.02, PRR = 2.60, IC = 1.38, EBGM = 2.60) and psychiatric disorders (n = 1,659, ROR = 4.15, PRR = 3.52, IC = 1.82, EBGM = 3.52). We eventually identified 100 valid PTs that met the criteria of the four algorithms. Drug ineffective, dyskinesia, depression, somnolence, suicidal ideation were considered to be the common PTs of deutetrabenazine. Tongue thrust (n = 4, ROR 253.47, PRR 253.35, IC 7.88, EBGM 235.95), grunting (n = 5, ROR 78.49, PRR 78.45, IC 6.26, EBGM 76.71) and drooling (n = 17, ROR 13.21, PRR 13.19, IC 3.72, EBGM 13.14) were not mentioned in the specification, but the high signal intensity suggested that they may be the potential adverse reactions.ConclusionThe efficacy of deutetrabenazine may be accompanied by some potential adverse effects in several systems. Adverse events in psychiatric, neurologic, gastrointestinal and respiratory need to be monitored in clinical practice.

Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) approved for the treatment of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. However, as a relatively new therapeutic agent, the long-term safety profile and adverse event (AE) profile of BV require further investigation. This study aimed to identify significant and unexpected AEs associated with BV using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) databases. Data on BV-related AEs were extracted from the FAERS and JADER databases. Signal detection was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Risk signals were categorized according to system organ classes (SOCs) and preferred terms (PTs) as defined by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 26.0. In addition, the onset times of BV-related AEs were analyzed. Between 2004 and 2023, a total of 19,279 and 2,561 AEs related to BV were recorded in the FAERS and JADER databases, respectively. At the SOC level, prominent signals in the FAERS database included blood and lymphatic system disorders, benign, malignant, and unspecified neoplasms (including cysts and polyps), as well as congenital, familial, and genetic disorders. In the JADER database, the most notable signals involved benign, malignant, and unspecified neoplasms, blood and lymphatic system disorders, and nervous system disorders. At the PT level, the top five signals in the FAERS database were peripheral motor neuropathy, peripheral sensory neuropathy, pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, febrile bone marrow aplasia, and polyneuropathy. Unexpected AEs included febrile bone marrow aplasia and Guillain-Barré syndrome. In the JADER database, the top five signals included peripheral motor neuropathy, peripheral sensory neuropathy, bacterial gastroenteritis, febrile neutropenia and pneumonia, with unexpected AEs such as left ventricular dysfunction, cardiomegaly, retinal detachment, and marasmus. The median onset time of AEs was 22 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7-81 days) in FAERS and 27 days (IQR 7-73 days) in JADER. The signal detection results from the FAERS and JADER databases highlight the importance of monitoring significant and unexpected AEs associated with BV, particularly in the early stages of treatment. These findings contribute to enhancing the post-marketing safety profile of BV and offer valuable insights for clinical risk management strategies.

To date, only two drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are approved for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In addition, very few studies have reported on the safety profile of either drug in large populations. This study aims to identify and compare adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with pirfenidone and nintedanib in real-world settings by analyzing data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). In addition, we utilized data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database for external validation. The ADE reports on both drugs from 2014 Q3 to 2024 Q2 in FAERS and from 2008 Q1 to 2024 Q1 in JADER were collected. After deduplication, Bayesian and non-Bayesian methods for disproportionality analysis, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multiple Gamma Poisson Shrinkers (MGPS), were used for signal detection. Additionally, time to onset (TTO) analysis were performed. In total, 35,804 and 20,486 ADE reports were identified from the FAERS database for pirfenidone and nintedanib, respectively. At the system organ class (SOC) level, both drugs have a positive signal value for "gastrointestinal disorders," "respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders," and "metabolism and nutrition disorders." Other positive signals for pirfenidone include "general disorders and administration site conditions," and "skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders," while for nintedanib, they were "investigations," "infections and infestations," and "hepatobiliary disorders." Some positive signals were consistent with the drug labels, including nausea, decreased appetite, and weight decreased identified in pirfenidone, as well as diarrhea, decreased appetite, abdominal pain upper, and epistaxis identified in nintedanib. We also identified unexpected signals not listed on the drug label, such as decreased gastric pH, and pneumothorax for pirfenidone, and constipation, flatulence for nintedanib. The median onset time for ADEs was 146 days for pirfenidone and 45 days for nintedanib, respectively. Although the two antifibrotics differed in the proportion of periods in which the ADEs occurred, these ADEs were likely to continue even after a year of treatment. In the external validation of JADER, the number of reports for pirfenidone and nintedanib were 265, and 1,327, respectively. The disproportionality analysis at the SOC and preferred term (PT) levels supports the FAERS results. This study systematically investigates and compares the ADEs and their onset times at the SOC and specific PT levels for pirfenidone and nintedanib. Our results provide valuable pharmacological insights for the similarities and differences between the safety profiles of the two drugs and highlight the importance of monitoring and managing the toxicity profile associated with antifibrotic drugs.

ObjectiveTo investigate which fluoroquinolone is safer when combined with bedaquiline for tuberculosis treatment by using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.MethodsWe selected data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2013 to the second quarter (Q4) of 2024 from the FDA FAERS database for disproportionality analysis. Signal detection was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM).ResultsThis study analyzed 12, 303, 879 reports from the FAERS database, including 722 reports related to the combination of bedaquiline and levofloxacin (with 2,723 adverse events) and 573 reports related to the combination of bedaquiline and moxifloxacin (with 2,233 adverse events). For the bedaquiline-levofloxacin regimen, these reports were categorized into 100 preferred terms (PTs) and 24 System Organ Classification (SOCs). The three most common SOCs were hepatobiliary disorders (n = 128, ROR 5.79, PRR 5.56, IC 2.48, EBGM 5.56), blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 217, ROR 5.04, PRR 4.72, IC 2.24, EBGM 4.71), and metabolism and nutrition disorders (n = 185, ROR 3.44, PRR 3.27, IC 1.71, EBGM 3.27). In terms of PTs, the three strongest signals were portal fibrosis (ROR 330.64), hepatitis C RNA increased (ROR 301.24), and toxic optic neuropathy (ROR 238.11). Reports of prolonged QT interval on ECG (125 cases) and anemia (130 cases) were significantly more frequent than other PTs. For the bedaquiline-moxifloxacin regimen, these reports were categorized into 85 preferred terms (PTs) and 24 System Organ Classification (SOCs). The three most common SOCs were hepatobiliary disorders (n = 141, ROR 7.9, PRR 7.47, IC 2.9, EBGM 7.46), ear and labyrinth disorders (n = 40, ROR 4.03, PRR 3.97, IC 1.99, EBGM 3.97), and cardiac disorders (n = 141, ROR 3.08, PRR 2.95, IC 1.56, EBGM 2.95). The three strongest PT signals were chronic pyelonephritis (ROR 563.29), bronchopleural fistula (ROR 314.86), and toxic neuropathy (ROR 187.11). Prolonged QT interval on ECG (152 cases) remained the most frequently reported PT. In both treatment regimens, individuals under 45 years of age experienced a higher frequency and variety of AEs, indicating the need for enhanced monitoring. For those over 45, particular attention should be given to ECG changes, especially in men. Finally, some PTs with extremely high signal strength, such as chronic pyelonephritis (ROR 563.29), hepatitis C RNA increased (ROR 301.24), and bronchopleural fistula (ROR 301.24), may represent rare adverse events associated with the combination of bedaquiline-fluoroquinolone.ConclusionOur study suggests that the safety profile of bedaquiline combined with moxifloxacin does not appear superior to that of bedaquiline combined with levofloxacin in terms of cardiac, hepatic, and neurological effects. Therefore, in the BPaLM regimen, considering the substitution of moxifloxacin with levofloxacin may be worthwhile if their efficacy is proven to be similar. Increased monitoring may be required for individuals under 45 years of age and male MDR-TB patients.

To explore adverse event (AE) signals of Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. AE reports primarily associated with CZA were retrieved from the FAERS database from the second quarter of 2015 to the second quarter of 2023. Signal detection was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) methods. A total of 750 AEs reports with CZA as the preferred suspected drug were obtained, identifying 66 preferred terms (PTs) involving 24 system organ classes (SOCs). Besides, the AEs already mentioned in the drug label, this study also revealed some new, clinically valuable potential AEsignals, such as Cholestasis (n = 14, ROR 29.39, PRR 29.15, IC 3.34, EBGM 29.11), Drug-induced liver injury (n = 8, ROR 9.05, PRR 9.01, IC 2.25, EBGM 9.01), Hepatocellular injury (n = 7, ROR 13.90, PRR 13.84, IC 2.41, EBGM 13.63), Haemolytic anaemia (n = 5, ROR 24.29, PRR 24.22, IC 2.42, EBGM 40.53), etc. Additionally, AE signals with higher intensity were identified, such as Hypernatraemia (n = 5, ROR 40.73, PRR 40.61, IC 2.31, EBGM 24.19), Toxic epidermal necrolysis (n = 4, ROR 11.58, PRR 11.55, IC 1.89, EBGM 11.54). Therefore, special vigilance for these potential AEs is warranted when using CZA clinically. This study highlights the potential AEs and risks associated with the clinical use of CZA, particularly the risks related to Cholestasis, Drug-induced liver injury, Haemolytic anaemia, Hypernatraemia, and Toxic epidermal necrolysis.

A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Newer Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Disproportionality Analysis from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database