Abstract

The successful implementation of sustainable resource management strategies depends on the availability of indicators that are capable of reflecting system complexity adequately but can easily be computed and communicated. However, systematic assessment of the scope and limits of simple indicators is often lacking. In the present study two indicators that can readily be derived from a material flow analysis structure are applied to and evaluated in a large and complex system of phosphorus and nitrogen management in Austria. Circularity (C) is defined as the share of recycled materials in total system throughput, whereas the Substance Concentration Efficiency (SCE), an indicator based on statistical entropy, measures the extent to which a substance is concentrated or diluted while passing through the system. For comparison the indicators were normalized with respect to a best-case and worst-case scenario (C¯ and SCE¯). Although both indicators correspond well in their general statements, clear differences in the prioritization of different aspects of sustainability can be observed. While C¯ focuses on increasing recycling, emission reduction and system downsizing have stronger effects on SCE¯. SCE¯ therefore is considered more suitable for providing first indications on sustainability in Austrian nutrient management.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.