Abstract

The completeness of registration in the national, population based cancer registry in Denmark was evaluated for the first 23 years (1943-1966) of operation. The registry was linked to a complementary data file on 5674 Danish invasive cervical cancer patients enrolled in an international, clinical follow-up study on the basis of identifying information including name, month and year of birth and date of cervical cancer diagnosis. The cancer register had a deficit of 2.2% (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6) cervical cancer patients; this figure is low compared to those of other cancer registers. Some 80% of the identified cases were retrieved by computerized matching alone, and an additional 15% were identified by combining computerized and visual matching procedures. Scrutiny of non-retrieved case records revealed that major errors in the identifiers of the cohort used for linkage were responsible for inability to identify an additional 1.7%. The presents study underlines the importance of meticulously recorded, high quality key identifiers in registers, and linkage of cohorts to establish the presence or absence of disease.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.