Abstract
signal to clipping noise ratio (SCR) and active-set methods are two existing methods for peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) reduction based on tone reservation. In this paper, the computational complexit ies of these two methods are analyzed and simulation is done for comparing their PAPR-reducing performance . The simulation results show that active-set method requires less computational complexity than that of SCR method while they achieve similar PAPR reduction performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
