Abstract

This paper compares microwave brightness temperature (T/sub B/) estimated by two radiobrightness models: a multilayer coherent radiative transfer (CRT) model and a single-layer Fresnel reflectance model. Two dielectric mixing schemes were used along with the models to calculate permittivity (real part of the dielectric constant). Model T/sub B/ and permittivity estimates were compared and validated against Huntsville, AL 1998 field experiment measurements. Model differences can be attributed to the mixing scheme, the radiobrightness model, or the vertical profile representation. Two sets of simulations were performed to quantify the sources of variation, one using observed son temperature and moisture profiles as input, and another using uniform profiles. Using uniform profiles, systematic differences in permittivity estimated by the mixing schemes resulted in T/sub B/ differences as large as 15 K. However, for uniform profiles, differences in T/sub B/ estimated by the radiobrightness models for a given permittivity value were less than 2 K. For cases using observed profiles, near-surface drying of the profiles resulted in T/sub B/ values from the CRT model 6-10 K higher than estimates from the Fresnel model, which determines T/sub B/ based on 0-5 cm mean moisture and temperature. Therefore, the major sources of T/sub B/ variations were the dielectric mixing scheme and the shape of the near-surface moisture profile. No radiobrightness/mixing scheme combination exhibited superiority across all plots and times.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.