Comparison of two different techniques of mobilization in mechanical neck pain with decrease temporomandibular joint mobility

Abstract

Pain in the anatomic region of neck is known as mechanical neck pain which is primarily caused by overuse of a normal anatomical structure, secondary to injury and deformity of anatomical structure. Also, mechanical neck pain can be defined as generalized neck pain provoked by sustained neck postures, neck movement, and pain on palpation of cervical musculature without pathologies. Restrictions of the neck movement occur and forced movement on the neck may worsen the pain. Mechanical neck pain is also known as nonspecific neck pain. It is a common complaint which affects 45-54% of the general population. The incidence of neck pain is higher in women (15%) than men (9%). High prevalence of neck pain was reported in desk job workers. 1-year prevalence of neck pain and work-related neck pain was reported as 43.3% and 28.3%. To compare the effect of Maitland and Mulligan mobilization with myofascial release on mechanical neck pain with decreased temporomandibular joint mobility. Total 45 subjects were selected and divided into three groups by random sampling method. This study concludes that Maitland mobilization and Mulligan mobilization are effective in mechanical neck pain with TMJ disability.