Abstract
Serological confirmation of measles is achieved by detecting the specific immunoglobulin M (IgM), and it is important to evaluate new commercial inmunoassays in order to ensure the quality of results. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of a novel automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), Virclia IgM measles (Vircell, Spain), with that of the widely used Liaison measles IgM assay (DiaSorin, Italy). A panel of 86 sera from laboratory-confirmed cases was used for the sensitivity calculation, and 59 sera from healthy individuals and those with other viral infections were used for the specificity calculation. Sensitivity values were 96.5% for Virclia and 97.6% for Liaison; specificity values were 93.2% for Virclia and 96.6% for Liaison; neither difference was statistically significant VirClia IgM measles is a good alternative to other immunoassays for the serological confirmation of measles.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
