Comparison of two anti-histones antibodies commercial assays in an immunology laboratory and systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

BackgroundAnti-histones antibodies (AHAs) are antibodies directed against histone proteins – structural proteins that provides scaffolding for DNA to be wrapped around. AHAs, measured in the serum, are diagnostically helpful in cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE). In the diagnostic laboratory, they may be measured by enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assay (ELISA) or line immunoassays (LIA); however, the performance of these have never been directly compared in the literature. MethodsWe evaluated a commonly used commercial ELISA and LIA to compare the performance in our immunology laboratory. Retrospective and prospective analyses were undertaken over a 5.5-year period. We also examined their performance in the model disease of SLE and compared their performance to disease activity and the main clinical features. ResultsOne hundred and thirty-five patients were evaluated including 65 SLE patients. Based on the quantitative cut-offs, there was only moderate agreement between the two assays (κ = 0.444). Both assays only had modest agreement with the clinical situation of the evaluated patients. When considered within the SLE context, both assays were moderately correlated with disease activity. Positive AHAs by ELISA were associated with SLE cytopaenias, and both ELISA and LIA correlated with positive anti-double stranded DNA. ConclusionsModerate agreement analytically were seen between ELISA and LIA methods in a general laboratory cohort. Both assays were comparable in their diagnostic performance. ELISA detection of AHAs appears to have some clinical use in our cohort of SLE patients. Future studies are required to explore the clinical utility of AHAs in SLE and other disorders.