Abstract
The performance of three artificial neural network (ANN) designs that account differently for the effects of seasonal rainfall and runoff variations were investigated for monthly rainfall-runoff simulation on an 815 km2 watershed in central Oklahoma. The ANN design that accounted explicitly for seasonal variations of rainfall and runoff performed best by all performance measures. Explicit representation of seasonal variations was achieved by use of a separate ANN for each calendar month. For the three ANN designs tested, a regression of simulated versus measured runoff displayed a slope slightly under 1 and positive intercept, pointing to a tendency of the ANN to underpredict high and overpredict low runoff values.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
