Abstract
The intrinsic and extrinsic microbial contamination of large-volume parenterals has been associated with bacteremias in hospitalized patients. When epidemiologic data suggest the association of contaminated intravenous (i.v.) fluids with disease, appropriate laboratory methods must be devised to analyze quickly the suspect fluid. A study was undertaken to compare three laboratory test methods (standard pour plate [SPP] technique, ATP procedure, and Limulus amebocyte lysate [LAL] assay) for detecting the presence of microorganisms in artificially contaminated i.v. fluid. SPP proved the most sensitive of the assay techniques used, but a 24-h period was required for microbial growth. The LAL assay appeared more sensitive in detecting i.v. contamination than the ATP method. These studies suggest that the LAL and ATP methods can be used for the rapid detection of microbial contamination in i.v. fluid. SPP and LAL procedures would have practical laboratory application when the contamination of i.v. fluids is suspected, and they are more sensitive in detecting microbial contamination in these solutions than the ATP method.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
