Comparison of the quality of obturation following endosonic versus hand instrumentation

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the quality of root canal obturation following preparation by endosonic or hand instrumentation. Forty single-canal, extracted lower premolar teeth were selected. One group of 20 teeth was prepared using a standard step-back technique, the other 20 teeth were prepared with an ultrasonic machine. The groups were subdivided, with two operators preparing 10 teeth of each group. The teeth were obturated by a third operator using cold laterally condensed gutta percha. The root apices were then immersed in methylene blue dye for 48 h and the teeth sectioned longitudinally. Image analysis recorded the amount of sealer and void within the obturated canal. The linear distance of dye penetration was measured to provide an indication of apical seal. Examination of the root canal shape resulting from the different preparation techniques used was also undertaken. No significant difference was noted in the percentage of sealer and void present in the root canals obturated after endosonic or hand instrumentation. There was a slightly greater although not significant increase in the degree of linear penetration of dye in canals prepared endosonically. The endosonic technique used in this study appeared to produce a canal preparation of slightly less continuous taper than that obtained with hand preparation.