Comparison of the Efficiency and Theoretical Hardware Consumption of Four Different Dynamic and Static Branch Predictors

Abstract

When CPU enters the era of instruction level parallelism, the execution cycle of instructions has become shorter and shorter. Meanwhile, the processing speed of CPU has become faster and faster. However, only from the execution process of CPU instructions, there is a key factor that limits the speed of CPU processing instructions, namely, the branch instruction processing. The branch predictor is used to predict the execution result of the current branch instruction (taken/non-taken), which can make the program counter get the target instruction to continue to execute according to the prediction result before calculating the target jump address. If the prediction is correct, it will greatly improve the execution efficiency of CPU. This paper starts from the two basic categories of static branch prediction and dynamic branch prediction. Then analyse their prediction principle, prediction accuracy and component consumption used for prediction. For static branch predictor, its hardware consumption is less than that of dynamic branch predictor, and its accuracy is also lower than that of dynamic branch predictor. Moreover, their shortcomings are pointed out in this paper. At last, based on the original branch predictor, better branch predictors developed in recent years are introduced. In the future, considering the hardware consumption, I think the development of branch predictor will continue to optimize the branch predictor combining global history and local history, from the number of stored entries, the correlation between branch instructions and so on. On the premise of executing a large number of instructions, every little improvement in the efficiency of the predictor will bring huge benefits.