Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of Bravelle s.c., Bravelle i.m., and Follistim s.c. in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET. Design: Open-label, randomized, parallel group, multicenter study. Setting: Eleven academic and private fertility clinics with experience in IVF-ET. Patient(s): Infertile premenopausal women with regular ovulatory menstrual cycles undergoing IVF-ET. Intervention(s): Down-regulation with leuprolide acetate followed by up to 12 days of Bravelle s.c. (n = 60), Bravelle i.m. (n = 59), or Follistim s.c. (n = 58); hCG administration, oocyte retrieval, and ET. Main Outcome Measure(s): Mean number of oocytes retrieved; patients with ET, chemical, clinical and continuing pregnancies; mean peak serum E 2 levels; adverse events and injection site pain scores. Result(s): There were no significant differences among treatment groups in mean number of oocytes retrieved, peak serum E 2 levels, patients with ET, continuing pregnancies, or live births. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in the number, nature, or intensity of adverse events. Patients treated with Bravelle s.c. or Bravelle i.m. experienced significantly less injection site pain than patients treated with Follistim s.c. Conclusion(s): Bravelle s.c. and Bravelle i.m. are comparable in efficacy and safety to Follistim s.c. in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
