Abstract
Objective To compare the the curative effect of laparoscopy and open operation in surgical repair of gastric perforation. Methods The clinical data of 68 patients with gastric perforation were analyzed.According to different operation method, the patients were diviede into laparoscopic group and laparotomy group, 34 cases in each group.The patients in the two groups were given laparoscopy or laparotomy, respectively. Results The operation time between the two groups had no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, length of hospital stay in the laparoscopic group were (24.9±7.3)mL, (31.9±10.5)h, (7.4±2.9)d, respectively, which were significantly less than those in the laparotomy group, the differences were statistically significant (t=9.953, 5.226, 7.441, all P<0.05). The incidence rate of postoperative complications of the laparotomy group was 32.35%, which was significantly higher than 8.82% of the laparoscopic group, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=5.757, P=0.016). Conclusion The curative effect of laparoscopic downward gastric perforation repair is superior to laparotomy, patients have rapid recovery, less complications, it is worthy of clinical popularization and application. Key words: Laparoscopy; Peptic ulcer perforation; Stomach
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
