Abstract
Three techniques are described for comparing the tangible and intangible costs and benefits involved in environmental and water resources projects. The three techniques are: (1)Engineering judgment; (2)cost-benefit analysis; and (3)preference analysis. A game used in interviews to establish preferences is described and the interpretation of the results of the game is covered. Development and cautious use of preference analysis as part of the evaluation of tangible and intangible costs and benefits is recommended.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
