Abstract
Abstract This article provides information about comparative research on designing of spinning trajectories for products with a non-circular cross-section. Generation of two outlines for the two mandrels was carried out using three methods: (1) a spreadsheet, (2) a 2D CAD program, and (3) a 3D CAD program. Technological tests were carried out using mandrels with the following geometries: ellipse and square. The material used in the research was aluminum Al 1050A. Due to the high degree of complexity in the design of the trajectory, Method 1 was used only for spinning of the ellipse. Methods 2 and 3 were used for spinning the square. Only Method 3 was suitable for programming of upsetting moves of tool. Test of Vickers's microhardness was conducted on sample 3. The influence of the spinning trajectory on the drawpiece was evaluated by measuring the percentage reduction of side wall thickness.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
