Abstract
Pretreatment methods for measuring stable sulphur (δ34S) and oxygen (δ18O) isotope ratios of dissolved sulphate from watersheds have evolved throughout the last few decades. The current study evaluated if there are differences in the measured stable S and O isotope values of dissolved sulphate from forested watersheds when pretreated using three different methods: Method 1 (M1): adsorb sulphate on anion exchange resins and send directly to isotope facility; Method 2 (M2): adsorb sulphate on anion exchange resins, extract sulphate from anion exchange resins, and send the produced BaSO4 to the isotope facility; and Method 3 (M3): directly precipitate BaSO4 without anion exchange resins with the precipitates being sent to the isotope facility. We found an excellent agreement of the δ34Ssulphate values among all the three methods. However, some differences were observed in the δ18Osulphate values (M1 versus M2:−1.5 ‰; M1 versus M3:−1.2 ‰) associated with possible O contamination before isotope measurement. Several approaches are recommended to improve the pretreatment procedures for δ18Osulphate analysis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
