Comparison of robot versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: Aretrospective study.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore whether a robot-assisted (RA) technique has advantages over the conventional fluoroscopy-assisted (FA) technique in clinical and radiological outcomes and whether it could decrease the incidence of mis-implantations of pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) correction surgery. A total of 101 patients with AIS were recruited (RA group: 45 patients underwent RA screw insertion; FA group: 56 patients underwent FA screw insertion). When comparing the radiological data between the two groups, the major and secondary curves were both corrected proficiently with no difference in Cobb angle comparison at the last follow-up, suggesting that both the RA technique and the FA technique could lead to efficient radiographic correction and similar clinical outcomes (all, p > 0.05). In the RA group, operation time, blood loss, and transfusion volume were significantly greater than those in the FA group, while the accuracy of screw implantations in patients with AIS with a thoracic scoliotic curve in the RA group was higher than that in the FA group. In conclusion, both the RA and FA techniques could approach proficient radiographic correction and similar clinical outcomes in AIS surgery. Compared with the conventional fluoroscopy technique, the RA technique might improve the accuracy of screw implantations in patients with AIS with a thoracic scoliotic curve, while the increased operation time, blood loss, and transfusion volume might be the disadvantages due to the preliminary stage of the learning curve.