Comparison of residual stability in thoracolumbar spine fractures using neutral zone measurements

Abstract

Because treatment algorithms for spinal injuries depend largely on the clinical assessment of stability after injury, this study both quantified and compared the mechanical stability after three different patterns of injury in the thoracolumbar spine. We created compression fractures, burst fractures, and flexion-distraction injuries in 26 thoracolumbar specimens from human cadavers in order to compare residual stability as a function of type of injury. Spinal stability was evaluated using measurements of the boundaries of the neutral zone, which provide a measure of spinal laxity in various directions of motion. An increase after injury was indicative of greater spinal laxity and hence reduced residual stability. Geometric characteristics (or parameters) of the neutral zone boundaries were used for statistical comparison between the types of injury. Of the three groups, burst fractures retained the least residual stability and compression fractures, the greatest. The angular ranges of motion in the neutral zone for burst fractures demonstrated increases (compared with average values for intact specimens) of 154% in flexion-extension, 134% in lateral bending, and 108% in torsion after injury. The results for flexion-distraction injuries were similar to those for burst fractures in flexion-extension (126%) and torsion (62%); however, more residual stability was retained in lateral bending than was seen for burst fractures (48%). Compression fractures retained the most residual stability, with increases in motion of 40% in flexion-extension, 56% in lateral bending, and 3% in torsion. These findings may be useful in determining the necessity for surgical stabilization of the spine and selection of the appropriate system of fixation.