Abstract
Relative potency estimates were performed by parallel line skin test assay (PLST) and ELISA inhibition methods for three polymerized allergen extracts (Bermuda grass, orchard grass, and a copolymer of short and giant ragweed) versus four unmodified RAST standardized reference extracts (Bermuda grass, orchard grass, and giant and short ragweed) in nine subjects. One subject experienced a systemic reaction, requiring treatment at the end of the PLST assay. Another subject had a systemic reaction during limited skin testing performed approximately 72 hours after completion of PLST. Relative potency values for the polymerized extracts obtained by PLST were much lower than those obtained by ELISA inhibition, but results were significantly (r = 0.95; p < 0.01) correlated. Because polymerized allergen extracts are designed to be hypoaller genie, a skin test assay may underestimate their potency relative to an unmodified reference extract.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
