Abstract
In this work, we compare susceptometry-based oximetry (SBO) and two T2 -based methods for estimating resting baseline SvO2 in the superior sagittal sinus (SSS). SBO is a field-mapping technique whereas in T2 -based methods the intravascular blood signal is isolated either with velocity-encoded projections [projection-based T2 (PT2 )] or a tag-control scheme [T2 -relaxation under spin tagging (TRUST)] after T2 -preparation. The measurements were performed on twelve healthy subjects (mean age = 33 ± 6 years) at 3 Tesla field strength. The reliability, precision, and reproducibility were examined for the three techniques. The mean (± standard deviation) SvO2 quantified by SBO, PT2 , and TRUST were found to be 65.9 ± 3.3, 65.6 ± 3.5, and 63.2 ± 4.1%. The standard deviation (SD) for 10 consecutive measurements in the quantified SvO2 was less than 2.7%, 4.7%, and 5.0% for SBO, PT2 , and TRUST across all subjects. In testing reproducibility across different days, the resulting SDs were 2.6, 3.5, and 2.0% for SBO, PT2 , and TRUST. The results indicate that all three SvO2 quantification techniques to be reliable with good agreement between PT2 and SBO while TRUST yielded slightly lower values compared with the other two techniques.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
