Abstract
The metastable pitting behavior of austenitic stainless steel (304 SS) and duplex stainless steel (2205 DSS) under U‐bending deformation is comparatively investigated. This study highlights the effects of differences in inclusions and matrix between 304 SS and 2205 DSS with regard to the metastable pitting behavior under tensile and compressive deformation. The results show that the pit initiation frequency of 304 SS increases in the order: tensile < as‐received < compressive; in contrast, the initiation frequency of 2205 DSS increases in the order: as‐received < tensile < compressive. In addition, tensile and compressive deformation change the preferential initiation sites of metastable pitting in 2205 DSS. It is proposed that the types of transient signals can be comprehensively and objectively distinguished by the two parameters (t g/t rep) and [(I p/Q g):(I p/Q rep)]. The correlation relationship between transient signals and pitting morphologies is clarified by cluster analysis. Both tensile and compressive deformations promote the growth of a few metastable pits, thus increasing the transition probability from metastability to stability. Overall, both tensile and compressive deformations are detrimental to the pitting corrosion resistance of the experimental steels.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.