Comparison of lower and upper respiratory tract specimens for the detection of respiratory viruses and atypical pneumonia pathogens by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction.

BackgroundThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends upper respiratory tract (URT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing as the initial diagnostic test for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Lower respiratory tract (LRT) testing for patients requiring mechanical ventilation is also recommended. The goal of this study was to evaluate concordance between paired URT and LRT specimens in children undergoing pre-admission/procedure screening or diagnostic testing. We hypothesized that < 10% of paired tests would have discordant results.MethodsSingle center cross-sectional study including children with artificial airways who had paired URT and LRT SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing between 4/1/2020 and 6/8/2020. URT specimens included nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and aspirates. LRT specimens included tracheal aspirates and bronchoalveolar lavages. URT and LRT specimens were classified as paired if the two specimens were collected within 24 hours. Artificial airways included tracheostomies and endotracheal tubes. Tests were classified as diagnostic versus screening based on the indication selected in the order.Results102 paired specimens were obtained during the study period. Fifty-nine were performed for screening and 43 were performed for diagnosis of suspected SARS-CoV-2. Overall, 94 specimens (92%) were concordant, including 89 negative from both sources and 5 positive from both sources. Eight specimens (8%) were discordant, all of which were positive from the URT and negative from the LRT (Figure 1). Among patients undergoing screening, 3 of 4 positive tests were discordant and among symptomatic patients, 5 of 9 positive tests were discordant. There were no instances of a positive LRT specimen with a negative URT specimen.Figure 1. Performance of upper and lower respiratory tract SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing in children with artificial airwaysConclusionOverall, most paired samples from the URT and LRT yielded concordant results with no pairs positive from the LRT and negative from the URT. These data support the CDC recommendation that URT specimens are the preferred initial SARS-CoV-2 test, while LRT specimens should be collected only from mechanically ventilated with suspected SARS-CoV-2.DisclosuresAll Authors: No reported disclosures

Acute gastroenteritis is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in children and the elderly. The identification of various diarrhea-causing bacteria using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and rapid antigen testing has enabled a more detailed analysis of diarrhea-causing pathogens. Pre-vious reports have a limitation in that they do not include data on multiple infections in which two or more infectious agents are simultaneously detected, and there are no data on clinical information. We investigated various diarrhea-causing bacteria and viruses detected by multiplex real-time PCR for one year at a single institution. This study included 766 subjects who underwent multiplex real-time PCR testing of direct stool specimens for the purpose of diagnosis from April 2019 to February 2020. The multiplex PCR test used in our study can simultaneously detect 16 types of bacteria and five types of viruses. When two or more pathogens were detected by multiplex real-time PCR, they were confirmed using single conventional PCR or real-time PCR. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from electronic medical records (EMR). The detected bacteria and viruses were analyzed according to age and season. Out of a total of 352 stool samples with pathogen detection, 265 (75.3%) were detected as single and 87 (24.7%) showed co-detection. The highest rates of single and co-detection were for Clostridium perfringens, and the highest combination of co-infections was for C. perfringens and Staphylococcus aureus. We demonstrated that different age groups showed varying pathogen distributions. While no special seasonality was found in the monthly distribution, it should be noted that the total number of cases peaked in September. The data presented in our study serves as epidemiologically important basic data.

BackgroundPneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a major cause of hospitalization and mortality in HIV-infected African children. Microbiologic diagnosis relies predominantly on silver or immunofluorescent staining of a lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens which are difficult to obtain in children. Diagnosis on upper respiratory tract (URT) specimens using PCR has been reported useful in adults, but data in children are limited. The main objectives of the study was (1) to compare the diagnostic yield of PCR with immunofluorescence (IF) and (2) to investigate the usefulness of upper compared to lower respiratory tract samples for diagnosing PCP in children.MethodsChildren hospitalised at an academic hospital with suspected PCP were prospectively enrolled. An upper respiratory sample (nasopharyngeal aspirate, NPA) and a lower respiratory sample (induced sputum, IS or bronchoalveolar lavage, BAL) were submitted for real-time PCR and direct IF for the detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii. A control group of children with viral lower respiratory tract infections were investigated with PCR for PCP.Results202 children (median age 3.3 [inter-quartile range, IQR 2.2 - 4.6] months) were enrolled. The overall detection rate by PCR was higher than by IF [180/349 (52%) vs. 26/349 (7%) respectively; p < 0.0001]. PCR detected more infections compared to IF in lower respiratory tract samples [93/166 (56%) vs. 22/166 (13%); p < 0.0001] and in NPAs [87/183 (48%) vs. 4/183 (2%); p < 0.0001]. Detection rates by PCR on upper (87/183; 48%) compared with lower respiratory tract samples (93/166; 56%) were similar (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.46 - 1.11). Only 2/30 (6.6%) controls were PCR positive.ConclusionReal-time PCR is more sensitive than IF for the detection of P. jirovecii in children with PCP. NPA samples may be used for diagnostic purposes when PCR is utilised. Wider implementation of PCR on NPA samples is warranted for diagnosing PCP in children.

Multiplex PCR panels are powerful tools for rapid pathogen identification in patients with respiratory tract (RT) infections (1–6). In particular, analysis of upper respiratory tract (URT) specimens with the BioFire Respiratory Panel 2 (BRP2), which primarily targets viruses, decreases time to pathogen detection, duration of antibiotic use, and hospital length of stay (7, 8). In addition, many clinical laboratories have validated the BRP2 on lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens (9, 10). Recently, the BioFire Pneumonia Panel (BPN) was shown to accurately identify viruses as well as a broader array of bacteria in LRT specimens (11, 12). Clinical laboratories must now determine if the BRP2 or the BPN or both should be included in the test menu for LRT specimens, but data comparing of these assays in this context are not available. Here, we evaluate the performance of the BRP2 and the BPN on LRT samples from adults at a tertiary care academic medical center.

COVID-19 severity, rather than sex or age, predicts SARS-CoV-2 kinetics, and SARS-CoV-2 viral load from lower respiratory tract specimens may predict severe disease days before clinical deterioration for COVID-19 patients.

Multiplex PCR testing during respiratory infections: good for the patient, good for infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship

Introduction. Diagnosis of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) can be facilitated by the Panther Fusion (PF) automatic, random access PCR system for the detection of influenzavirus A (Flu A) and B (Flu B), parainfluenzavirus (Paraflu), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus (hMPV), rhinovirus (RV) and human adenovirus (AdV) in nasopharyngeal swabs.Aim. To evaluate the performance of PF in comparison with established methods, including subsets of (1) lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens and (2) upper respiratory tract (URT) hygiene screening specimens of patients without ARI symptoms.Methodology. The performance characteristics of PF were compared with bioMérieux R-Gene and laboratory-developed PCR tests (LDTs). Overall, 1544 specimens with 6658 individual diagnostic requests were analysed.Results. The overall concordances of PF and LDTs for Flu A, Flu B and AdV were 98.4, 99.9 and 96.1%, respectively; by re-testing of discrepant specimens concordances increased to 99.4, 99.9 and 98.0%, respectively. Initial concordances of PF and R-Gene assays for RSV, Paraflu, hMPV and RV were 98.4, 96.3, 99.3 and 96.0%, respectively, and retest concordances were 99.7, 97.9, 99.9 and 98.9%, respectively. No differences to the overall performance were found for the subgroups of LRT and hygiene screening specimens. PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values correlated very well between methods, indicating that a semi-quantitative diagnostic approach using Ct values (e.g. highly vs. weakly positive) could augment the diagnostic information.Conclusion. PF performed similar to R-Gene and LDTs not only for its intended use but also for LRT and hygiene screening specimens with shorter hands-on and turnaround times.

Staphylococcus aureus is a significant cause of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), particularly in mechanically ventilated patients. We used the fibronectin-binding protein A gene (fnbA) for the species-specific and quantitative detection of S. aureus directly from lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens by a Taq Man real time PCR. For this reason, a total of 269 lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens collected from patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia were assayed. Amplification of fnbA in serial dilutions ranged from 10(9) CFU/ ml to 10(2) CFU/ml. Standard curve of triplicate every dilution had slope 3.34±0.1 and R2>0.99 with SD 0.1. Based on these data, the sensitivity and specificity of the newly developed real time PCR targeting the fnbA gene were both 100%. The Cohen's Kappa test showed the Kappa value of 1.0. The fnbA gene is a potential marker for the species-specific detection of S. aureus and can be used to detect this bacterium in any clinical specimens by real time PCR. Moreover, this method reduces the time needed for quantitative detection of Staphylococcus aureus from LRT specimens to nearly 2 hours compared to 1 to 4 days for culture and provided sensitivity equal to or greater than culture.

The rapid spread of pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 has seriously threatened people. In this study, we detected the expression of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM and respiratory tract SARS-CoV-2 RNA in patients with COVID-19 and explored the correlation and clinical significance between SARS-CoV-2 antibody and respiratory SARS-CoV-2 RNA. From March 5, 2020 to April 28, 2020, 48 cases with COVID-19 diagnosed in Beijing Xiaotangshan Hospital were enrolled. SARS-CoV-2 RNAs were detected by real-time fluorescence RT-PCR method. Serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies were determined by colloidal gold immunochromatography. The statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test. In all the patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA among 270 upper respiratory tract (nasal or throat swabs) samples, 71 lower respiratory tract (sputum) samples, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibodies in 123 serum samples were detected during the hospitalization period. The positive rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was significantly higher than that of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM within the first week after symptom onset (p < 0.05). The positive rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was also significantly higher than that of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM during day 8 - 30 after symptom onset (p < 0.01). The positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the lower respiratory tract specimens (64.8%, 46/71) was significantly higher than that in the upper respiratory tract (46.7%, 126/270) (p < 0.05). The positive rate (100%, 4/4) of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in the lower respiratory tract specimens before IgG seroconversion was significantly higher than that of the positive rate (59.3%, 32/54) after IgG seroconversion (p < 0.01). The positive rate (72.2%, 57/79) of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in the upper respiratory tract specimens before IgG seroconversion was significantly higher than that of the positive rate (30.7%, 39/127) after IgG seroconversion (p < 0.01). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG might be detected within the first week after symptom onset. The application of SARS-CoV-2 antibody (IgG/IgM) detection is important for the suspected cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection with negative SARS-CoV-2 RNA results. The positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in the lower respiratory tract specimens was significantly higher than that in the upper respiratory tract. Sputum detection is recommended for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Using lower respiratory tract specimens may reduce the false negative PCR tests. The detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be improved by investigating follow-up specimens over time.

SARS CoV-2 Detection From Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract Specimens: Diagnostic and Infection Control Implications

Detection of influenza and non-influenza respiratory viruses in lower respiratory tract specimens among hospitalized adult patients and analysis of the clinical outcome.

Respiratory tract infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality at all ages and are seen as a very important public health problem all over the world. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of the pandemic on the epidemiological and seasonal characteristics of the agents by analyzing the respiratory viral infection agents, viral co-infections and associations with Coronavirus diseases-2019 (COVID-19) studied by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in the molecular microbiology laboratory in a three-year period, including the one-year period before the pandemic. Between March 2019 and December 2021, 8825 respiratory tract specimens accepted to the molecular microbiology laboratory with respiratory tract multiplex PCR test requests were included in the study. In addition, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) PCR test results of the patients with positive results with respiratory tract multiplex PCR test, which were studied within ± 3 days, were evaluated retrospectively. Respiratory viral pathogens were detected using FTD Respiratory Pathogens 21 kit (Fast Tract Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers Company). Two different kits based on real-time reverse transcription PCR were used for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in different periods. According to our results, at least one viral agent was detected in 2156 (24.4%) of a total of 8825 samples and a single agent was detected in 1843 (85.5%) of these. The distribution of viruses in the samples with a single agent was determined as RV, RSV A/B, HCoVs, AdV, flu A virus, MPV A/B, PIV 1-4, flu B virus, EV, BoV and PeV, in order of frequency. Multiple agents were found in 313 (14.5%) of these 2156 samples. They were found to be two agents in 291 samples, three in 21 samples and four in one sample. When the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results of the patients who had positive results with respiratory tract multiplex PCR and who were studied within ± 3 days were evaluated retrospectively, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 45 (3.5%) of 1277 samples in which at least one agent was detected. In four of these patients, SARS-CoV-2 was found together with multiple agents. Consequently, there was a sharp decrease in the prevalence of all viral agents during the pandemic period. It was evaluated that besides the COVID-19 infection, the restrictions applied during the pandemic period were also effective in this situation.

Background/AimsDiagnostic stool multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing has attracted considerable interest, because of its high sensitivity, short turnaround time, and ability to detect multiple organisms simultaneously. This study investigates the clinical usefulness of a stool multiplex bacterial PCR in patients with acute diarrhea.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the stool multiplex bacterial PCR results, clinical parameters, and clinical courses of patients hospitalized because of acute diarrhea between August 2014 and November 2016.ResultsA total of 725 patients (male, 372; mean age, 30.9 ± 29.3 years) underwent stool multiplex bacterial PCR. A total of 243 pathogens were detected in 226 patients. The detection rate of multiplex PCR testing was higher than that of stool culture (32.7% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.01). Severe symptoms of acute diarrhea (bloody diarrhea, frequent diarrhea) and prescribed empirical antibiotics were significantly more common in the positive multiplex PCR group (p = 0.02, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively). However, mean durations of hospital stay were similar in the 2 groups according to the multiplex PCR results (p = 0.32). In addition, Campylobacter spp., which was the most commonly detected pathogen (97/243, 39.9%), was significantly associated with frequent diarrhea and prescribed empirical antibiotics (p < 0.01), but not with duration of hospital stay (p = 0.09).ConclusionsWe concluded that stool multiplex bacterial PCR might be a useful tool for identifying bacterial etiology in patients with acute diarrhea, especially in those with Campylobacter spp. infection.

To compare the positivity rates of pathogens detected in diabetic and non-diabetic pneumonia cases, to assess the role of multiplex respiratory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in diagnosis, and to compare inflammatory parameters between the two groups. Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Pulmonology, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye, from September 2021 to June 2023. The study included 151 adults diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Group 1 comprised patients with diabetes (n = 42), and Group 2 consisted of patients without diabetes (n = 109). Patients' demographic and clinical data were collected and statistically compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, the median test, and the Chi-square Independence test. The positivity rate of the multiplex respiratory PCR test was significantly greater in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (p = 0.005). In Group 1, the most frequently identified nasopharyngeal pathogen was SARS-CoV-2. In Group 2, Streptococcus pneumoniae was the predominant pathogen. Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and neutrophil levels, as well as the CRP-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), were markedly higher in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (p = 0.016, p = 0.002, p = 0.016, and p = 0.016, respectively). A significantly higher PCR test positivity rate was found in diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic. Differences in the distribution of specific pathogens between the groups were observed. In addition, this study confirmed that diabetic pneumonia cases exhibit elevated levels of inflammatory biomarkers. Pneumonia, Diabetes, Multiplex respiratory polymerase chain reaction test.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant cause of hospital-associated pneumonia (HAP). The rapid identification of MRSA would be beneficial for early diagnosis. The study aimed to evaluate a multilocus, fluorescence-based PCR assay based on the detection of mecA and nuc genes for identification of S. aureusin lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens. Sensitivity and specificity of the PCR assay were analyzed. Clinical evaluation for the assay was performed using LRT specimens from patients with HAP, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were evaluated in comparison with semi-quantitative culture methods. The result showed the assay provided positive identification of all MRSA reference strains with a limit of detection for MRSA of 4 × 103 CFU/mL. Compared with semi-quantitative culture, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 100%, 89.6%, 75.0%, and 100%, respectively. A positive correlation between MRSA bacterial colonies and PCR copy number was found. The specificity and PPV reached 96.6% and 89.7% respectively, if the PCR copy number reached a definite positive threshold of 5.96 × 105. It suggested that this novel multilocus, fluorescence-based PCR assay proved to be a fast, sensitive and specific tool for direct detection of MRSA from LRT specimens.