Abstract

AbstractIn this study, we investigate the significance of diversity in the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. To do so, we study two different implementations of the PSO, being the so‐called linear and classical PSO formulations. While the behaviour of these two implementations is markedly different, they only differ in the formulation of the velocity update rule. In fact, the differences are merely due to subtle differences in the introduction of randomness into the algorithm.In this paper, we show that in algorithms employing the linear PSO velocity update rule, particle trajectories collapse to line searches in n‐dimensional space. The classical formulation does not suffer this drawback. Instead, directional diverse stochastic search trajectories are retained, which in turn helps to alleviate premature convergence. The performance of the classical implementation is therefore superior for all test problems considered, due to the presence of adequate diversity. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.