Comparison of high resolution cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridisation, and DNA studies to validate the diagnosis of Prader-Willi and Angelman's syndromes.

American College of Medical Genetics Statement on Diagnostic Testing for Uniparental Disomy

Epilepsy in Angelman syndrome

The Sins of the Fathers and Mothers: Genomic Imprinting in Mammalian Development

Recent studies have identified a new class of Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) patients who have biparental inheritance, but neither the typical deletion nor uniparental disomy (UPD) or translocation. However, these patients have uniparental DNA methylation throughout 15q11-q13, and thus appear to have a mutation in the imprinting process for this region. Here we describe detailed clinical findings of five AS imprinting mutation patients (three families) and two PWS imprinting mutation patients (one new family). All these patients have essentially the classical clinical phenotype for the respective syndrome, except that the incidence of microcephaly is lower in imprinting mutation AS patients than in deletion AS patients. Furthermore, imprinting mutation AS and PWS patients do not typically have hypopigmentation, which is commonly found in patients with the usual large deletion. Molecular diagnosis of these cases is initially achieved by DNA methylation analyses of the DN34/ZNF127, PW71 (D15S63), and SNRPN loci. The latter two probes have clear advantages in the simple molecular diagnostic analysis of PWS and AS patients with an imprinting mutation, as has been found for typical deletion or UPD PWS and AS cases. With the recent finding of inherited microdeletions in PWS and AS imprinting mutation families, our studies define a new class of these two syndromes. The clinical and molecular identification of these PWS and AS patients has important genetic counseling consequences.

Prader–Willi and Angelman syndromes are often referred to as a sister pair of neurodevelopmental disorders, resulting from different genetic and epigenetic alterations to the same chromosomal region, 15q11-q13. Some of the primary phenotypes of the two syndromes have been suggested to be opposite to one another, but this hypothesis has yet to be tested comprehensively, and it remains unclear how opposite effects could be produced by changes to different genes in one syndrome compared to the other. We evaluated the evidence for opposite effects on sleep and eating phenotypes in Prader–Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome, and developed physiological–genetic models that represent hypothesized causes of these differences. Sleep latency shows opposite deviations from controls in Prader–Willi and Angelman syndromes, with shorter latency in Prader–Willi syndrome by meta-analysis and longer latency in Angelman syndrome from previous studies. These differences can be accounted for by the effects of variable gene dosages of UBE3A and MAGEL2, interacting with clock genes, and leading to acceleration (in Prader–Willi syndrome) or deceleration (in Angelman syndrome) of circadian rhythms. Prader–Willi and Angelman syndromes also show evidence of opposite alterations in hyperphagic food selectivity, with more paternally biased subtypes of Angelman syndrome apparently involving increased preference for complementary foods (“baby foods”); hedonic reward from eating may also be increased in Angelman syndrome and decreased in Prader–Willi syndrome. These differences can be explained in part under a model whereby hyperphagia and food selectivity are mediated by the effects of the genes SNORD-116, UBE3A and MAGEL2, with outcomes depending upon the genotypic cause of Angelman syndrome. The diametric variation observed in sleep and eating phenotypes in Prader–Willi and Angelman syndromes is consistent with predictions from the kinship theory of imprinting, reflecting extremes of higher resource demand in Angelman syndrome and lower demand in Prader–Willi syndrome, with a special emphasis on social–attentional demands and attachment associated with bedtime, and feeding demands associated with mother-provided complementary foods compared to offspring-foraged family-type foods.

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Images in NeuroscienceFull AccessThe Human Genome: Detecting Chromosomal Deletions: Angelman and Prader-Willi SyndromesDeborah J. Morris-Rosendahl, PH.D., and Eike Back, M.D., Deborah J. Morris-RosendahlSearch for more papers by this author, PH.D., and Eike BackSearch for more papers by this author, M.D., Frieburg, GermanyPublished Online:1 Mar 2002https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.372AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Angelman syndrome and Prader-Willi syndrome are two related but clinically and genetically distinct neurogenetic syndromes, characteristically caused by deletion of the human chromosomal region 15q11-q13. Clinical features of Angelman syndrome include severe mental retardation with absence of speech, epileptic seizures, ataxia, inappropriate bursts of laughter, unusually happy disposition, hyperactivity, and micro- and brachycephaly. Patients with Prader-Willi syndrome show infantile hypotonia, mild to moderate mental retardation, hyperphagia with subsequent obesity, hypogonadism, short stature, mild facial dysmorphism, and characteristic behavior. In Angelman syndrome the chromosomal deletions are exclusively of the maternal chromosome, whereas in Prader-Willi syndrome the deletions are of paternal origin, i.e., the absence of any paternal contribution to the 15q11-q13 region. Both syndromes can result either from deletions or from uniparental disomy, in which two chromosomes 15 are inherited from a single parent, instead of one chromosome from each parent.The detection of chromosomal deletions has become routine in both prenatal and postnatal diagnosis with the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization, a process that vividly paints chromosomes or portions of chromosomes with fluorescent molecules. In situ hybridization is a powerful and versatile tool for the detection and localization of nucleic acid sequences (the constituents of genes) in cell preparations. The technique is based on the hybridization (attraction and complexing) of a labeled and complementary DNA or RNA probe to immobilized chromosomal preparations. Although radioactively labeled DNA probes were formerly used for this purpose, commercially available fluorescent probes are now available for diagnosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is routinely used to detect chromosomal rearrangements and deletions, including those associated with chromosomal microdeletion syndromes, such as Angelman syndrome or Prader-Willi syndrome.Address reprint requests to Dr. Tamminga, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland, P.O. Box 21247, Baltimore, MD 21228; [email protected] (e-mail). Image courtesy of the authors. FigureFluorescence in situ hybridization image showing the deletion of chromosomal region 15q11-q13 that causes Angelman syndrome. Two control probes—CEP 15 and LSI PML (Vysis, Downers Grove, Ill.)—are included in the probe mixture to highlight the short arms around the centromeric region (CEP 15 on 15p11.2, blue-green signals) and long arms (LSI PML on 15q22, orange-pink signals) of chromosome 15 and to detect possible chromosomal translocations. The absence of one of the orange-pink signals on one chromosome 15 (q11-q13, white arrow) indicates the deletion of the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated polypeptide N locus in this 3-year-old male Angelman syndrome patient. FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited byNone Volume 159Issue 3 March 2002Pages 372-372 Metrics PDF download History Published online 1 March 2002 Published in print 1 March 2002

Due to DNA technology, it is now apparent that the mechanisms of genetic disease are more complex than the model of a gene with biallelic expression in the diploid state. If a gene is imprinted, monoallelic expression is the norm when the chromosomes of a pair are inherited normally from each parent. Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the abnormal situation where both chromosomes of a pair come from the same parent. When the chromosome contains an imprinted gene, UPD may result in nullisomy or disomy for a functional copy of that gene. If there are two imprinted loci on the same chromosome, UPD for that chromosome results in nullisomy for one imprinted gene but functional disomy for the other a "diploid overdose" (DO). This situation has been well demonstrated in the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) which is the nullisomic phenotype for the PWS gene(s) on chromosome 15q11-13. Chromosome 15q11-13 also contains the gene for Angelman syndrome (AS) which has a phenotype distinct from PWS. Both loci are subject to imprinting--in PWS, the imprint is on the maternal chromosome 15, in AS it is on the paternal chromosome 15. All individuals with PWS due to maternal UPD, while functionally nullisomic for the PWS locus, are functionally disomic for the AS locus--a DO situation. Assuming that biallelic expression of an imprinted gene is harmful, one would expect DO for an imprinted gene to produce a phenotypic effect. Cases of PWS due to UPD do not appear to differ from those due to deletion (hypopigmentation in deletional cases can be explained by loss of D15S12 downstream from the critical region). There is no good evidence of DO for the AS locus in PWS due to UPD. Why then was it 'necessary' in evolutionary terms to imprint the AS locus and maintain the imprint faithfully for life. A similar situation of two imprinted genes on the same chromosome occurs with IGF2 and H19 on chromosome 11p15. Maternal imprinting for IGF2 and paternal imprinting for H19 is the norm. Paternal UPD in this situation does lead to a DO effect, namely Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. The possibility of a DO effect needs to be considered when assessing the phenotypic spectrum of UPD for other chromosomes currently under investigation.

The molecular basis of Angelman syndrome and Prader-Willi syndrome is well established, and genetic testing for these disorders is clinically available. Imprinting abnormalities account for up to 4% of patients with Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes. Deletions of the imprinting center region are the molecular abnormality observed in a subset of Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome cases with imprinting defects. Genetic testing of imprinting center deletions in patients with Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome is not readily available. Such testing is important for the diagnostics of Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome because it allows for more accurate diagnosis and recurrence risk prediction in families. Here we describe the development, validation, and implementation of a real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay for imprinting center deletion detection in patients with Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome, which we have incorporated into our genetic testing strategy for these disorders. To date we have tested, on a clinical basis, five patients with either Angelman or Prader-Willi syndrome in whom an imprinting center defect was implicated and found a deletion in one patient that was determined to be familial.

Reply to Camprubí et al

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) are distinct neurodevelopmental disorders with interrelated genetic mechanisms because genomic imprinting within the chromosome 15q11-13 region affects both the PWS and the AS locus. Methylation analysis is one method of distinguishing between the maternally and paternally inherited chromosome 15. Here we present clinical and molecular data on a large series of 258 referred patients, evaluated with methylation analysis: 115 with suspected PWS and 143 with suspected AS. In these patients, the clinical phenotype was graded into three groups: classical (group 1); not classical but possible (group 2); not classical and unlikely (group 3). For PWS, a fourth group consisted of hypotonic babies. DNA methylation analysis confirmed the diagnosis of PWS in 30 patients (26%) and AS in 28 patients (20%). For 21 PWS patients the mechanism was established: 15 had deletions, 4 had uniparental disomy (UPD) and 2 a presumed imprinting defect. Clinically all those with an abnormal methylation pattern had the classical phenotype and none of those with a normal methylation pattern had classical PWS. For 23 AS patients in whom a mechanism was established, 17 had a deletion, 3 had UPD and 3 had a presumed imprinting defect. There was greater clinical overlap in AS, with 26 classical AS patients having a normal methylation pattern while an abnormal methylation pattern was seen in one patient from group 2. In addition, there were a further 40 patients with a normal methylation pattern in whom AS was still a possible diagnosis. Our conclusion is that methylation analysis provides an excellent screening test for both syndromes, providing approximately 99% diagnosis for PWS and for AS, a 75% diagnostic rate, supplemented for the remaining 25% with an essential basic starting point to further investigations.

Screening of Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome in school children with moderate to profound mental retardation in southern Taiwan.

Newborn screening for Angelman syndrome (AS), Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), and chromosome 15 duplication syndrome (Dup15q) may lead to benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. To examine the feasibility of newborn screening for these chromosome 15 imprinting disorders at population scale. In this diagnostic study, the validation data set for the first-tier SNRPN test, called methylation-specific quantitative melt analysis (MS-QMA), included 109 PWS, 48 AS, 9 Dup15q, and 1190 population control newborn blood spots (NBS) and peripheral tissue samples from participants recruited from January 2000 to December 2016. The test data set included NBS samples from 16 579 infants born in 2011. Infants with an NBS identified as positive for PWS, AS, or Dup15q by the first-tier test were referred for droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing for confirmatory testing. Data analyses were conducted between February 12, 2015, and August 15, 2020. In the validation data set, the median age for the 77 patients with PWS was 3.00 years (IQR, 0.01-44.50 years); for the 46 patients with AS, 2.76 years (IQR, 0.028 to 49.00 years); and for the 9 patients with Dup15q, 4.00 years (IQR, 1.00 to 28.00 years). Thirty-eight patients (51.4%) in the PWS group, 20 patients (45.5%) in the AS group, and 6 patients (66.7%) in the Dup15q group who had sex reported were male. The validation data set showed MS-QMA sensitivity of 99.0% for PWS, 93.8% for AS, and 77.8% for Dup15q; specificity of 100% for PWS, AS, and Dup15q; positive predictive and negative predictive values of 100% for PWS and AS; and a positive predictive value of 87.5% and negative predictive value of 100% for Dup15q. In the test data set of NBS samples from 16 579 infants, 92 had a positive test result using a methylation ratio cut-off of 3 standard deviations from the mean. Of these patients, 2 were confirmed to have PWS; 2, AS; and 1, maternal Dup15q. With the use of more conservative PWS- and AS-specific thresholds for positive calls from the validation data set, 9 positive NBS results were identified by MS-QMA in this cohort. The 2 PWS and 2 AS calls were confirmed by second-tier testing, but the 1 Dup15q case was not confirmed. Together, these results provided prevalence estimates of 1 in 8290 for both AS and PWS and 1 in 16 579 for maternal Dup15q, with positive predictive values for first-tier testing at 67.0% for AS, 33.0% for PWS, and 44.0% for combined detection of chromosome 15 imprinting disorders for the validation data set. The findings of this diagnostic study suggest that it is feasible to screen for all chromosome 15 imprinting disorders using SNRPN methylation analysis, with 5 individuals identified with these disorders out of 16 579 infants screened.

The kinship theory of genomic imprinting predicts that imprinted genes affect mother-child and child-child interactions. According to this theory paternally expressed genes will promote behaviours that increase costs of maternal investments and enable children to compete with siblings. Maternally expressed genes will promote behaviours that reduce the mother’s costs of child-rearing and enable children to engage in collaborative actions. Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome are caused by the absence of expression of imprinted genes in 15q11-q13. Children with Prader-Willi syndrome lack the expression of paternally expressed genes; children with Angelman syndrome lack maternally expressed genes. The current paper discusses the role of imprinted genes in the development of communicative behaviours during the transition from breastfeeding to (consuming) solid food. Its focus is the possible role of imprinted genes in the development of empathy out of (reactive) crying, and in the development of behaviours necessary for joint action. Observed behavioural differences between children with Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome, and data from mouse models on the effects of imprinted genes on brain development, are used to explore possible effects of imprinted genes. (Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 78-88).

Routine screening for microdeletions by FISH in 77 patients suspected of having Prader-Willi or Angelman syndromes using YAC clone 273A2 (D15S10)

About 70% of patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) have a common interstitial de novo microdeletion encompassing paternal (PWS) or maternal (AS) loci D15S9 to D15S12. Most of the non-deletion PWS patients and a small number of non-deletion AS patients have a maternal or paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 15, respectively. Other chromosome 15 rearrangements and a few smaller atypical deletions, some of the latter being associated with an abnormal methylation pattern, are rarely found. Molecular and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis have both been used to diagnose PWS and AS. Here, we have evaluated, in a typical routine cytogenetic laboratory setting, the efficiency of a diagnostic strategy that starts with a FISH deletion assay using Alu-PCR (polymerase chain reaction)-amplified D15S10-positive yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) 273A2. We performed FISH in 77 patients suspected of having PWS (n = 66) or AS (n = 11) and compared the results with those from classical cytogenetics and wherever possible with those from DNA analysis. A FISH deletion was found in 16/66 patients from the PWS group and in 3/11 patients from the AS group. One example of a centromere 15 co-hybridization performed in order to exclude cryptic translocations or inversions is given. Of the PWS patients, 14 fulfilled Holm's criteria, but two did not. DNA analysis confirmed the common deletion in all patients screened by the D15S63 methylation test and in restriction fragment length polymorphism dosage blots. In 3/58 non-deletion patients, other chromosomal aberrations were found. Of the non-deleted group, 27 subjects (24 PWS, 3 AS) were tested molecularly, and three patients with an uniparental methylation pattern were found in the PWS group. The other 24/27 subjects had neither a FISH deletion nor uniparental methylation, but two had other cytogenetic aberrations. Given that cytogenetic analysis is indispensable in most patients, we find that the FISH deletion assay with YAC 273A2 is an efficient first step for stepwise diagnostic testing and mutation-type analysis of patients suspected of having PWS or AS.