Comparison of General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Stability in Patients Undergoing Hernia Repair

Abstract

Introduction. The issue of choosing the optimal anesthesia that is least dangerous to the patient’s life is still the main concern of the workers in the anesthesia and intensive care department, including techniques, medications, plans, and instructions followed in order to choose the best anesthesia. It can also be said that spinal anesthesia is the best and most standard anesthesia for those who repair hernia.The aim of the study — learn about obtaining and verifying hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing hernia repair under anesthesia.Materials and methods. An accurate and recent study of patients attending Al-Hussein Medical City and Al-Hassan Hospital in the city of Karbala. We included 100 patients who underwent a herniotomy, were divided into two groups on the types of general and spinal anesthesia. Fifty patients received general anesthesia and 50 patients received spinal anesthesia. Data related to the patient’s age, weight, change in blood pressure and pulse rate were analyzed. The study analyzed patients aged 20–90, dividing them into two groups: general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA), for careful follow-up before, during, and after operations.Results. We show that it is also more stable in SA which is about 56 % in comparison to GA which is about 40 % but increased blood pressure is more in GA which was 32 % and 24 % in SA, but decreased blood pressure is also more in GA which was 28 % and in SA was 20 %. In this study, as shown, there is more stability in heart rate, which is 56 % in SA but in GA it is 32 % and the increase in heart rate was 34 % in SA but was 60 % in GA. The decreased heart rate was 10 % in SA and about 8 % in GA and the effect of SA is more stable.Conclusions. We found spinal anesthesia was more than general anesthesia in stability of blood pressure and heart rate and minimum or normal.