Comparison of Gadobenate-Enhanced MRI and Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using LI-RADS Version 2018: A Prospective Intraindividual Randomized Study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Gadobenate and gadoxetate show different degrees of intracellular accumulation within hepatocytes, potentially impacting these agents' relative performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to perform an intraindividual comparison of gadobenate-enhanced MRI and gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for detection of HCC and to assess the impact of inclusion of hepatobiliary phase images on HCC detection for both agents. METHODS. This prospective study enrolled 126 patients (112 men, 14 women; mean age, 52.3 years) at high risk for HCC who consented to undergo two 3-T liver MRI examinations (one using gadobenate [0.05 mmol/kg], one using gadoxetate [0.025 mmol/kg]) separated by 7-14 days. The order of the two contrast agents was randomized. All examinations included postcontrast dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images (120 minutes for gadobenate, 20 minutes for gadoxetate). Three radiologists independently reviewed the gadobenate and gadoxetate examinations in separate sessions and recorded the location of detected observations. Observations were classified using LI-RADS version 2018 and using a LI-RADS modification whereby hepatobiliary phase hypointensity may upgrade observations from category LR-4 to LR-5. Observations classified as LR-5 were considered positive interpretations for HCC. Diagnostic performance for histologically confirmed HCC (n = 96) was assessed. RESULTS. Across readers, sensitivity for HCC for gadobenate versus gadoxetate was 74.0-80.2% versus 54.2-67.7% using dynamic images alone and 82.1-87.4% versus 66.3-81.1% using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images. For HCCs measuring 1.0-2.0 cm, sensitivity for gadobenate versus gadoxetate was 61.9% (all readers) versus 38.1-57.1% using dynamic images alone and 76.2-85.7% versus 52.4-61.9% using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images. PPV for HCC ranged from 88.6% to 97.4% across readers, agents, and image sets. CONCLUSION. Sensitivity for HCC was higher for gadobenate than for gadoxetate, whether using dynamic images alone or dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images; the improved sensitivity using gadobenate was more pronounced for small HCCs. Whereas hepatobiliary phase images improved sensitivity for both agents, sensitivity of gadobenate using dynamic images alone compared favorably with that of gadoxetate using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support gadobenate as a preferred agent over gadoxetate when performing liver MRI in patients at high risk for HCC.