Comparison of flail and multiple simple rib fracture patterns among patients included in rib fracture studies; A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rib fractures occur in almost half of blunt chest wall trauma victims in Australia. They are associated with a high rate of pulmonary complications, and consequently, with increased discomfort, disability, morbidity, and mortality. This article summarises thoracic cage anatomy and physiology, and chest wall trauma pathophysiology. Institutional clinical strategies and clinical pathway “bundles of care” are usually available to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with chest wall injury. This article analyses multimodal clinical pathways and intervention strategies that include surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF) in thoracic cage trauma patients with severe rib fractures, including flail chest and simple multiple rib fractures. The management of thoracic cage injury should include a multidisciplinary team approach with proper consideration of all potential avenues and treatment modalities (including SSRF) to obtain the best patient outcomes. There is good evidence for the positive prognostic role of SSRF as part of a “bundle of care” in the setting of severe rib fractures such as ventilator-dependent patients and patients with flail chest. However, the use of SSRF in flail chest treatment is uncommon worldwide, although early SSRF is standard practice at our hospital for patients presenting with multiple rib fractures, flail chest, and/or severe sternal fractures. Several studies report that SSRF in patients with multiple simple rib fractures lead to positive patient outcomes, but these studies are mostly retrospective studies or small case–control trials. Therefore, prospective studies and well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the benefits of SSRF in patients with multiple simple rib fractures, as well as in elderly chest trauma patients where there is scant evidence for the clinical outcomes of SSRF intervention. When initial interventions for severe chest trauma are unsatisfactory, SSRF must be considered taking into account the patient’s individual circumstances, clinical background, and prognostic projections.

BackgroundMultiple rib fractures are common injuries in both the young and elderly. Rib fractures account for 10% of all trauma admissions and are seen in up to 39% of patients after thoracic trauma. With morbidity and mortality rates increasing with the number of rib fractures as well as poor quality of life at long-term follow-up, multiple rib fractures pose a serious health hazard. Operative fixation of flail chest is beneficial over nonoperative treatment regarding, among others, pneumonia and both intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. With no high-quality evidence on the effects of multiple simple rib fracture treatment, the optimal treatment modality remains unknown. This study sets out to investigate outcome of operative fixation versus nonoperative treatment of multiple simple rib fractures.MethodsThe proposed study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients will be eligible if they have three or more multiple simple rib fractures of which at least one is dislocated over one shaft width or with unbearable pain (visual analog scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale (NRS) > 6). Patients in the intervention group will be treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Pre- and postoperative care equals treatment in the control group. The control group will receive nonoperative treatment, consisting of pain management, bronchodilator inhalers, oxygen support or mechanical ventilation if needed, and pulmonary physical therapy. The primary outcome measure will be occurrence of pneumonia within 30 days after trauma. Secondary outcome measures are the need and duration of mechanical ventilation, thoracic pain and analgesics use, (recovery of) pulmonary function, hospital and ICU length of stay, thoracic injury-related and surgery-related complications and mortality, secondary interventions, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness comprising health care consumption and productivity loss. Follow-up visits will be standardized and daily during hospital admission, at 14 days and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.DiscussionWith favorable results in flail chest patients, operative treatment may also be beneficial in patients with multiple simple rib fractures. The FixCon trial will be the first study to compare clinical, functional, and economic outcome between operative fixation and nonoperative treatment for multiple simple rib fractures.Trial registrationwww.trialregister.nl, NTR7248. Registered May 31, 2018.

Multiple vertebral compression and rib fractures in elderly patients with pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a common scenario associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Severe pain prevents normal ventilation and leads to atelectasis, consolidation, and pneumonia. Subsequently, these patients frequently develop respiratory failure and require intubation and critical care. Therefore, adequate analgesia is often a life-saving intervention. Anesthetic management of a 78-year-old kyphotic patient with T6, T7, and T9 rib fractures on the right and T10–12 vertebral compression fractures sustained in an accidental fall is presented. She had inadequate pain control and was unable to take a deep breath or cough. Her respiratory status was deteriorating, with tachypnea and worsening hypoxia, necessitating bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) support. Since thoracic epidural analgesia was contraindicated owing to compressive vertebral fractures and to the pending respiratory failure, we opted for a unilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the T7 level and bilateral retrolaminar (RL) blocks at the T10 level. Following the procedure, the pain was immediately relieved and the patient was able to take deep breaths. Shortly thereafter, her respiratory status improved, with the respiratory rate coming back close to the baseline. The patient was subsequently weaned from BiPAP support and discharged from the intensive care unit. While the combination of ESP and RL blocks is not routinely used in patients with multiple rib and vertebral compression fractures, our report indicates that it may be an excellent alternative for analgesia in situations where thoracic epidural and/or paravertebral blocks are contraindicated and when timely intervention could be potentially life-saving.

There is no consensus on the effectiveness of surgical stabilization in multiple rib fractures in Asia, especially among patients with a non-flail rib fracture pattern. We aim to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in an Asian population with multiple non-flail rib fractures. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched in this systematic literature review and meta-analysis to identify studies conducted in Asia that included patients with multiple non-flail rib fractures in at least one of their treatment groups. The intervention of interest was SSRF, and the comparator was a nonoperative treatment. The duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV) was the primary outcome. Posttreatment pain score, pneumonia, atelectasis, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), hospital length of stay (HLOS), need for tracheostomy, respiratory function, functional outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and mortality were identified as the secondary outcomes. A random effects model (REM) was used to pool data for outcomes reported in two or more studies. A total of 12 studies (n=2,440 patients) were included. There was a significantly shorter DMV {mean difference (MD): -5.23 [95% confidence interval (CI): -9.64 to -0.81], P=0.02}, lower 4-week post-treatment pain score [standard mean difference (SMD): -2.24 (95% CI: -3.18 to -1.31), P<0.00001], lower risk for pneumonia [risk ratio (RR): 0.46 (95% CI: 0.23 to 0.95), P=0.04], lower risk for atelectasis [RR: 0.44, (95% CI: 0.29 to 0.65), P<0.0001], shorter ICU LOS [MD: -4.00 (95% CI: -6.33 to -1.66), P=0.0008], and shorter HLOS [MD: -6.54 (95% CI: -9.28 to -3.79), P<0.00001] in favor of SSRF. Effect estimates for the need for tracheostomy [RR: 0.67 (95% CI: 0.42 to 1.08), P=0.10] and mortality [RR: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.37 to 2.41), P=0.90] were nonsignificant. In the Asian population with mainly non-flail rib fracture patterns, SSRF was associated with shorter DMV, ICU LOS, and HLOS as well as lower risks for atelectasis and pneumonia, and pain scores after 4 weeks. The risk of mortality was comparable between treatment groups.

Patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) are at an increased risk of pathological rib fractures even if there is no history of trauma. Early and accurate identification of such fractures are crucial for appropriate management. We present a case of a child with OI type 3 with multiple rib fractures who presented with transient cyanosis and increased work of breathing without a history of significant trauma. The patient’s chest radiographs were reported to have a single, new right posterior fourth rib fracture and an old, healing anterior fourth rib fracture. A point-of-care ultrasound performed by the attending pediatric emergency physician revealed additional findings of refracture over the old right anterior fourth rib fracture site and a new left posterior third rib fracture. These findings of multiple and bilateral rib fractures better account for the patient’s initial presentation. This case highlights the added advantages of ultrasound over conventional chest radiographs in the evaluation and diagnosis of a tachypnoeic pediatric patient with underlying metabolic bone disease and a complex skeletal structure with multiple pathological rib fractures but no chest tenderness.

Background:Traumatic rib fracture is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Recent studies highlight the inadequacy of age and the number of rib fractures (NRFs) to assess patients' care needs, which may unnecessarily increase the burden of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Therefore, we sought to clarify the clinical outcomes of patients admitted to a level I trauma center with multiple blunt-trauma rib fractures by age and fracture location.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18-95 admitted to Doctors Hospital at Renaissance Health with multiple rib fractures during 2017-2020. Patients with major vascular/cerebral injuries or emergency surgery from other injuries were excluded. The study population comprised 71 patients aged ≤65 and 53 patients aged >65 years. The primary study outcomes included mortality and non-home discharge. ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS), total hospital length of stay (HLOS), and days on the ventilator were the secondary outcomes. Study outcomes were also analyzed by stratifying patients by fracture location.Results: Patients aged >65 years with multiple blunt-trauma rib fractures had lower mortality rates despite a higher prevalence of comorbidities but with higher rates of non-home discharges compared to younger patients. However, the mortality and non-home discharge odds ratios were not statistically significant. Also, median ICU-LOS and HLOS were numerically higher in geriatric patients but were not statistically significant. Nonetheless, younger patients required significantly more days of respiratory support than older patients. Similar differences were observed in the clinical outcome of patients ≤65 or >65 years when stratified by fracture locations.Conclusion: Young patients with blunt trauma rib fractures may have similar, if not worse, clinical outcomes than geriatric patients. These findings underscore the need for individual assessment of the patient's trauma severity independent of age, the number of rib fractures, or fracture location to reduce ICU burden.

&lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Objectives&lt;/st&gt; The performance and timing of surgical fixation of multiple simple rib fractures and flail chest wall remains controversial. We report our experience with acute and delayed multiple simple rib fracture and flail chest wall surgical fixation. &lt;/sec&gt; &lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Methods&lt;/st&gt; Since December 2006, 46 patients had surgical fixation using external titanium plates and bicortical screws for either multiple simple rib fractures or flail chest. We analysed operation details, hospital stay and complications. &lt;/sec&gt; &lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Results&lt;/st&gt; 29 patients [Group 1, 21 males, median age 54 (range 31-77) years] underwent fixation within 6 days following injury (range 1-43). Indications included: significant deformity/displacement, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 19; respiratory failure, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 6; uncontrolled pain, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 3; persistent pneumothorax, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 1. 17 patients [Group 2, 12 males, median age 58 (range 25-76) years] had delayed fixation at 12 (range 4-159) months following injury due to persistent pain, dyspnoea or deformity. 24 patients in Group 1 had flail chest vs 5 in Group 2 (&lt;it&gt;P&lt;/it&gt; &lt; 0.001). Critical care stay was zero in Group 2. Eighteen patients in Group 1 had median critical care stay of 4 (range 0.5-34) days. Postoperative length of stay (PLOS) was longer in Group 1 for both flail chest and multiple simple rib fractures (13.6 ± 10 days vs 3.6 ± 0.6 days, &lt;it&gt;P&lt;/it&gt; = 0.1, and 7.4 ± 3.8 days vs 7 ± 1.7 days, &lt;it&gt;P&lt;/it&gt; = 0.01, respectively). Nine patients in Group 1 (31%) developed complications (chest infection, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 5; sputum retention, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 1; deep wound infection, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 1; prolonged respiratory wean, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 1; internal jugular vein thrombosis, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 1) vs 3 patients in Group 2 (17.6%, &lt;it&gt;P&lt;/it&gt; = NS; surgical infection, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 1; neurogenic pain, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 1; haemothorax, &lt;it&gt;n&lt;/it&gt; = 1). Although symptomatic improvement was noted in most Group 2 patients, 18% had persistent pain. &lt;/sec&gt; &lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Conclusions&lt;/st&gt; Fixation of multiple rib fractures is safe and effective in both the acute and delayed setting. Patients undergoing acute repair have an acceptable critical care stay. Although early repair is recommended, delayed fixation may still be of benefit. &lt;/sec&gt; &lt;sec&gt;&lt;st&gt;Disclosure&lt;/st&gt; All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. &lt;/sec&gt;

Multiple displaced rib fractures often result in a poor prognosis. Open reduction and internal fixation has been shown to provide benefits for patients with displaced rib fractures and flail chest. Nevertheless, for patients who are unwilling or unsuitable for surgery, the therapeutic options are limited. We developed a novel plastic vacuum device for rib fractures external stabilization. This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy of this device against a traditional chest strap in polytrauma patients with multiple rib fractures. A retrospective investigation was conducted on polytrauma patients with multiple rib fractures admitted to our trauma center between March 2020 and March 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: vacuum external fixation and chest strap. Comparative analysis was conducted on baseline parameters, injury characteristics, and clinical outcomes between the two groups. In this study, 54 patients were included, with 28 receiving chest strap and 26 undergoing vacuum external fixation. Results showed that, at 3days and 7days postintervention, the vacuum external fixation group had significantly lower visual analog scale scores during deep breathing and coughing (P< .05). Vacuum external fixation also reduced pleural drainage duration and volume, as well as lowered the risk of pneumonia and other complications (P< .05). Furthermore, the vacuum external fixation group demonstrated notable improvements in vital capacity, tidal volume, blood-gas test results, and a shorter hospital length of stay. According to the study findings, vacuum external fixation appears to offer benefits to patients with multiple rib fractures, potentially reducing the risk of complications and improving overall clinical outcomes.

The financial burden of rib fractures: National estimates 2007 to 2016

The expedited discharge of patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures is cost-effective

Pain associated with rib fractures is challenging to manage. This pilot trial aimed to assess the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) for controlling pain associated with multiple rib fractures. This randomised, single-blinded, controlled pilot study was conducted on trauma patients who had three or more rib fractures and had been admitted at a tertiary care centre. The study was conducted after receiving ethical approval and trial registration. Patients were randomised into two groups: TEA and ESPB, from February 2019 to February 2020. In the ESPB group, a unilateral or bilateral catheter was inserted in the erector spinae space, and an infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine was started. In the TEA group, the thoracic epidural catheter was inserted, and 0.125% bupivacaine infusion was started. Rescue analgesia using intravenous morphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered if the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was >3 for 48 hours postoperatively. The primary endpoint was total morphine consumption after administration of ESPB and TEA in patients with a rib fracture. Forty patients completed the study, with 20 in each group. Total morphine consumption by patients in the ESPB group was 5.38 ± 2.6 mg per 48 hours, and by those in the TEA group was 5.22 ± 2.11 mg per 48 hours (P = 0.883). Thirty minutes after starting the infusion, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 64.8 ± 2.1 mmHg in the ESPB group and 57.2 ± 1.3 mmHg in the TEA group (P = 0.00001). Total morphine consumption was not statistically different in this pilot trial among the two groups. ESP block may provide similar analgesia with better haemodynamic stability compared to TEA in patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures.

The anaesthetic management of multiple traumatic injuries poses numerous challenges. In this report, we present the cases of two patients with polytrauma including pneumothoraces and multiple rib fractures. The first patient, a 39-year-old man, presented with multiple left upper limb fractures, multiple bilateral rib fractures, bilateral pneumothoraces and fractures of multiple facial and cranial bones. The second patient, a 39-year-old woman, presented with right-sided radial and ulnar fractures, a right-sided pelvic fracture, and multiple right-sided rib fractures with an associated pneumothorax. We used ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus, interscalene and supraclavicular blocks in the first case and a combined spinal and epidural after ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca and supraclavicular blocks in the second case. In both cases, the use of multiple regional techniques allowed us to avoid the risks of general anaesthesia in patients with conservatively managed pneumothoraces.

Continuous regional anesthesia with erector spinae plane catheters for patients with multiple rib fractures.

Background and aimsPain management for patients with chest trauma rib fractures can be challenging. Recently, ultrasound guided serratus anterior muscle plane block has emerged as an alternative analgesic technique to...

BackgroundNonoperative treatment is currently the standard therapy for rib fractures. However, there is a trend towards surgical fixation from conservative management over the last decade. While surgical fixation of rib fractures has shown promising results, its impact on the clinical results remains unclear based on the current literature. As such, the present study aims to compare the short-term outcomes of multiple rib fracture patients treated by surgical fixation with traditional conservative management.MethodsData for patients with multiple (three or more) rib fractures admitted to our department between January 2012 and January 2019 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Propensity score matched patients were compared between those treated with surgical rib fixation and those of nonoperatively treated. Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay for multiple rib fracture patients, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay for flail chest patients. Secondary outcomes included in hospital mortality, ICU usage rate, duration of ventilator support, ventilator usage rate, and pneumonia.ResultsThe study included 1,201 patients with mean age of 50.1±12.7 years, of whom 954 (79.4%) were male. The average number of rib fractures was 6.3±2.4, with a mean injury severity score of 20.5±7.3. Among them, 563 (46.9%) patients had surgical rib fixation and 638 (53.1%) patients received nonoperative treatment. There were 191 patients with a flail chest, 133 (69.6%) had operative rib fixation and 58 (30.4%) were nonoperatively treated. After propensity score match, the hospital length of stay was not significantly differed between surgery and conservative management in multiple rib fracture patients (10.7±3.4 vs. 10.2±3.8 days, P=0.067), nor were the secondary outcomes, in terms of in hospital mortality (0.9% vs. 1.1%, P=0.704), ICU usage rate (12.3% vs. 12.9%, P=0.820), duration of ventilator support (100.1±13.9 vs. 99.8±20.7 hours, P=0.822), ventilator usage rate (12.0% vs. 12.9%, P=0.732), and pneumonia (24.3% vs. 24.9%, P=0.861). For patients with a flail chest, shorter ICU length of stay was found to be associated with surgical rib fixation comparing with nonoperative treatment (5.5±1.9 vs. 6.7±2.1 days, P=0.011). No secondary outcomes such as in hospital mortality (4.4% vs. 4.4%, P=1.000), ICU usage rate (20.0% vs. 22.2%, P=0.796), duration of ventilator support (113.1±20.4 vs. 131.2±19.5 hours, P=0.535), ventilator usage rate (20.0% vs. 20.0%, P=1.000), pneumonia (28.9% vs. 31.1%, P=0.818) were significant different between the operative and nonoperative groups.ConclusionsSurgical rib fixation results in a shorter ICU length of stay in patients with a flail chest, and a comparable outcome for patients with multiple rib fractures when compared with nonoperative treatment.