Abstract
The method of electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage test for common-mode chokes has been standardized in IEC 62228–5 Annex E. However, there is a concern about the reproducibility of the ESD damage test using the ESD gun described therein. Against this background, the possibility of replacing the ESD gun with a transmission line pulse–human metal model (TLP-HMM) was investigated. The results of the ESD damage test using the ESD gun and TLP-HMM are found to be similar but not exactly the same, especially at low frequencies. Moreover, due to the different waveform generation principles and circuit configurations of the ESD gun and TLP-HMM, even if a load of the same structure is used to calibrate the ESD gun and TLP-HMM, when they are applied to other loads, it is still difficult to guarantee that the discharge currents are the same. The findings raise an issue on how to define a standard TLP-HMM so that it could provide the worst test result compared to the ESD gun.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.