Comparison of EMT blood pressure measurements with an automated blood pressure monitor: On scene, during transport, and in the emergency department

Abstract

Auscultation or palpation of blood pressure in critically ill patients by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) can be difficult, if not impossible, because of ambient noise, motion artifact, limited access to patients, or weak pulses. Automated blood pressure monitors (ABPMs) have been designed to overcome these problems during field emergencies and patient transport. Our study compared blood pressure measurements taken by EMTs with measurements provided by a Lifestat ABPM. Measurements in emergency patients on scene, during transport, in the emergency department (ED), and in a controlled environment were compared. Measurements in the various sites were obtained from 57 patients, and provision was made for two measurements at each site. Comparison of on-scene systolic blood pressures yielded a mean absolute systolic difference of 10.46 +/- 1.42 mm Hg and a mean absolute diastolic difference of 9.33 +/- 1.32 mm Hg. During transport systolic pressures showed a mean absolute difference of 11.50 +/- 1.72 mm Hg, and diastolic pressures showed a mean absolute difference of 7.59 +/- 1.16 mm Hg. Mean absolute differences in the ED were 11.23 +/- 1.49 mm Hg systolic and 8.37 +/- 1.25 mm Hg diastolic. Ninety comparison measurements in a controlled environment yielded a mean absolute systolic difference of 8.74 +/- 0.87 mm Hg and a mean absolute diastolic difference of 7.97 +/- 0.72 mm Hg. Comparison of mean diastolic pressure differences between EMT and ABPM measurements in various settings revealed some small, but statistically significant, discrepancies that were not considered clinically relevant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)